Possibly, but that wouldn’t explain the tweets and instagram posts they also wish to include.
They actually would only need financial records to show that her income continued to remain the same or increased. The video of the actual performance has no probative value. Also not sure it’s germane when it’s 5 years later as opposed to the more immediate period 12-24 months after the article appeared.
The Slimes are desperate and hoping for a friendly judge, because they crossed the line between news and defamation and they know it, because they keep losing or settling.
They keep losing readers, advertisers and court cases and eventually they will either return to reality or go bankrupt.
Perhaps she made some "didn't want to show my face" representations or something. Weird that she appeared on that show at all, because I wouldn't have thought she'd anticipate a positive reaction.