Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: saintgermaine
...Under her new law, “... the homeowner’s obligation is to flee the home at the first sign of intrusion. If fleeing is not possible, he must cooperate with the intruder. But if violence breaks out it is the homeowner’s responsibility to make sure no one gets hurt. The best way to achieve this is to use the minimum non-lethal force possible because intruders will be able to sue for any injuries they receive at the hands of the homeowner. “In most instances the thief needs the money more than the homeowner does,” Meza reasoned. “The homeowner’s insurance reimburse his losses. On balance, the transfer of property is likely to lead to a more equitable distribution of wealth. If my bill can help make this transfer a peaceful one so much the better.”

This lady might just be the dumbest living carbon life form on the planet.

33 posted on 01/11/2022 12:29:31 PM PST by econjack (I'm not bossy. I just know what you should be doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: econjack

She makes AOC look like a genius, next consider the people who voted for her?


35 posted on 01/11/2022 12:32:53 PM PST by saintgermaine (Saintgermain the time traveler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: econjack

Well, of course it’s the homeowner’s responsibility. If someone gets hurt, it must be because the homeowner created an unsafe work environment for the thief. Call OSHA!!!

/sarc


44 posted on 01/11/2022 12:50:17 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson