Technically, a dictionary is supposed to update definitions based on the way words are used in common language at the time.
I get it that they changed the definition of vaccine expressly for this jab which was not a vaccine when they made it. But they started calling it a vaccine and a compliant media and medical establishment repeated it ad nauseam infinitum without pushing back as they should have.
So now people use the word too. Thus, the dictionaries should update the definition - as long as they break it out into a separate entry as it appears they did. Even if it is a contradiction, wouldn’t be the first time e.g. the word “bad” means two exact opposite things depending on how it’s used.
If Big Toy was as big as Big Pharma, a trillion dollar industry with the global media and politicians in their pockets, and they invented “must have” electronic AI animatronic dogs,
Would they be dogs? Or would they still just be electronic facsimiles of dogs?
The vax definitions were changed due to pressure from Big Pharma and their paid media talking heads. It was not some “grassroots public acceptance.” Almost every CNN show begins and ends, “Brought to you by Pfizer,” for example.
“Who pays the piper calls the tune.”
An electronic dog would still not be a dog, and changing the dictionary definition still would not make it a dog.
Lincoln said, “If you count a dog’s tail as a leg, how many legs does a dog have?”
His own answer was “Four. Calling a tail a leg does not make it a leg.”
A synthetic experimental mRNA spike protein injection will NEVER be a true vaccine, even if Big Pharma can buy off every news show and politician to pretend otherwise.
This will be especially clear when the death tool from the toxic spike protein injections mount and become inescapable.