Right, by implying the CDC (and by extension the FDA) are lying: I don't think I implied it. I think I shouted it to the mountain tops.
They put the unambiguous claim right there on their official website.
Still not evidence, and you know this.
There have to be hundreds if not thousands of people at the CDC and FDA involved in these reviews who would know if that claim was false.
Good. Then you (and they) should have no problem coming up with a number of autopsies they 'reviewed' and the results.
Do you think the CDC is lying when they say they review VAERS deaths, including autopsy reports?
I guess your listener is busted. I don't think it. I know it.
Do you think the CDC is telling the truth about reviewing autopsies (that don't exist)?
They put the unambiguous claim right there on their official website.Still not evidence, and you know this.
You don't understand the nature of evidence.
By your reasoning I could present any document, any study or any testimony and you could simply say "everyone's lying and they're all in on it" and thereby eliminate the evidence.
Luckily, there are rational people still around who can weigh the quality of evidence provided and draw conclusions.
On the one hand we have thousands of American career public health professionals who are making a seemingly good faith effort to monitor the vaccines, and who don't have any good reason to lie that I know of, and on the other we have someone on an internet forum saying thousands at the FDA and CDC have gotten together and are intentionally lying to the American people about the dangers of the vaccines.
Why? Well, that part's a little murky, as are most things when you start drilling down on these conspiracy theories.
You're obviously free to believe what you want, but all evidence is not of equal value, nor are all beliefs.