Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bagster; ransomnote
...you said CDC reviewed EVERY autopsy report...

...there are no autopsy reports to review...

"CDC and FDA clinicians review reports of death to VAERS including death certificates, autopsy, and medical records."

Why do you find this notion that VAERS deaths are reviewed to be so threatening?

Is it because if you acknowledged it the anti-vaxers would lose 90% of their material, which is misrepresentation of adverse event data?

31 posted on 01/08/2022 7:32:00 AM PST by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: semimojo; ransomnote; Jane Long; grey_whiskers; antceecee
Why do you find this notion that VAERS deaths are reviewed to be so threatening?

Because, like the cake, the notion is a lie. Why do you find it impossible to offer any proof that CDC reviews autopsies, other than they say that they do in that quote from them you just posted?

Show me the number of autopsies a.) performed on suspected vax deaths, b.) the number of autopsies reviewed by CDC, and c.) the results of those reviews.

Just do it and get it over with, shill. CDC and you can't get away with just saying things as if they are so, when they are not. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. And...with great power, comes great responsibility.

to be so threatening?

Well, let's analyze that one. Could it be that, if autopsies were performed and reviewed, we would find that, like the autopsies in Scotland, that the vaccine wreaks havoc on the body's internal organs and kills people?

That might throw a crimp in certain people's 'narrative', dontcha think? So it's not me that's threatened, government boy. It's the entire house of covid cards, lock, stock, and barrel.

So it's no wonder that you are predicating your entire narrative on the lie that CDC reviews autopsies that don't exist. Without that particular lie, what do you really have?

Be honest. The vax kills, and you know it. Go ahead, it's okay....

Oh hey, check this out. Notice this is not America or CDC....

Parliamentary Questions

(excerpt)

Three young people recently lost their lives after receiving their second dose of the COVID vaccine(1). These cases are the latest to be added to the growing list of sudden deaths to occur during the vaccine rollout.

The recent autopsy report for Camilla Canepa(2), who also died following vaccination, stated that the cause of death could be ‘reasonably attributed to an adverse effect from administration of the COVID vaccine’.

A German study(3) examining the autopsies of people who died shortly after vaccination suggests that 50% of these deaths were caused by the vaccine, which is also believed to be behind an unprecedented accumulation of lymphocytes found in the hearts, kidneys, livers and spleens of the deceased.

In the light of the above:

1. Does the Commission intend to reanalyse the costs and benefits of vaccinating young people, given the absolute risk of serious – or even fatal – adverse effects?

ABSOLUTE risk, nukka.

And that's how it's done, rabbit. Now you do America and CDC.


32 posted on 01/08/2022 8:34:45 AM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson