Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SARS-CoV-2 Directly Damages Kidneys, Study Finds
https://www.iflscience.com ^ | January 6, 2022 | Maddy Chapman

Posted on 01/06/2022 12:43:22 PM PST by Red Badger

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: Red Badger

Re my reply 13, above, a longer version is at:

https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4027009/posts?page=96#96

Requires study. And study requires going over portions of the videos, again and again, in order to understand what was said/written. If you can take the time, you will find some answers.

Presently, I agree with Dr. Chetty, that COVID-19 is Bi-Phasic; that, the two phases do not have a linear relationship (as in Phase II being an aggravated version of Phase I, let us say).

In order to subdue COVID-19, whenever you get it, no matter how many times you get it, you do need to maintain:

- a good vitamin regimen, esp. including vitamins D3, C, Zinc, without over-doing the supplements intake

- whatever else helps your immune system, particularly SLEEP and basic exercise to include a bit of strength training in order to maintain muscle - again, NOT over-doing it.

Presently, I believe that Ivermectin (IVM) does help some people.

Presently, I do NOT believe that boosters of “the shot” are helpful. Because, I am not satisfied that the immune system is itself, satisifed with what it finds as a result of the “vaccine.”

As a result of “the shot,” will the immune system successfully observe:

a) that a SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein sitting at the surface of effectively a hi-jacked, host human cell (that we are led to believe is only of the immune system), and that Spike Protein is determined (by our immune system) to be hostile, while

b) the hi-jacked, host human cell (and its type), are at the same time and thereafter, determined (by our immune system) to NOT be hostile?

Without such discrimination by the immune system, the odds of an “auto-immune disease” -type event occurring, would seem (to me, at least) to increase.

Therefore, I am NOT going to take any more “vaccine” shots re SARS-CoV-2, because I have not yet found / stumbled upon a reliable, solid explanation (with illustrations) of the immune system mechanisms, that would demonstrate the healthy discrimination by the immune system, that I seek.


21 posted on 01/07/2022 12:11:58 PM PST by linMcHlp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: linMcHlp

Here is my uneducated guess:

The mRNA ‘vaccines’ injected into the body, bloodstream, enters some cells in various places, muscles, heart, liver, wherever it lands.

They then go about their business of producing the very spike proteins that are on the surface of the virus.

The purpose is to get the body’s immune system to react to those spike proteins and produce antibodies against them.

Which it does, but only for a short while.

Why?

Because the spike proteins are produced FROM INSIDE THE BODY, INSIDE ITS OWN CELLS, THE IMMUNE SYSTEM EVENTUALLY RECOGNIZES THOSE SPIKE PROTEINS AS PART OF THE BVODY AND STOPS PRODUCING ANTIBODIES TO COMBAT THEM!

Then when a real virus enters the body from OUTSIDE, it’s like a spy sneaking into the fort because it is ‘recognized’ as part of the body and is not challenged!

Once safe inside, it begins to rapidly multiply and do it’s damages just as if there were no vaccine at all!......................................

Just my two cents............


22 posted on 01/07/2022 12:24:14 PM PST by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Looking over some of your two cents . . . I am wondering about a couple things:

You wrote:
The mRNA ‘vaccines’ injected into the body, bloodstream, enters some cells in various places, muscles, heart, liver, wherever it lands.

My concern:
I have been trying to narrow down, just EXACTLY, which are the human cells, that, for example, the Pfizer “mRNA lipid nanoparticles” enter? I have been given to understand, that the “mRNA lipid nanoparticles” ONLY ENTER cells that are, of the immune system. BUT, as I s-l-o-w-l-y understand from my own reading/studying, what I find, is that there is some probability that the “mRNA lipid nanoparticles” are ALSO entering some cells that ARE NOT of the immune system, too. At present, I wonder how bad an effect, that may be (if true)?

Next, you wrote:
They then go about their business of producing the very spike proteins that are on the surface of the virus.

My concern:
I am given to understand, that the produced (supposed to be “expressed” in molecular-ease lingo) Spike Proteins that are expected to mimic the version(s) on the surface of the SARS-CoV-2-virus, are to appear externally on the surface of the host cell (that was prompted (by the “vaccine” mRNA) to express said mimic). BUT, I am also finding some info that says, that some of the mimic’d -type Spike Proteins could also show up WITHIN some cells, by way of decaying or folding back into the host cell.

I really need to study:

“Major Histocompatibility Complex” (MHC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_histocompatibility_complex

and

“Antigen-Presenting Cell” (APC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antigen-presenting_cell

I suspect, that I need to know those two, well, in order to find some answers for my questions.


23 posted on 01/07/2022 4:01:43 PM PST by linMcHlp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson