Posted on 01/05/2022 10:57:25 AM PST by ransomnote
“Findings: In this interim analysis of surveillance data from 6.2 million persons who received 11.8 million doses of an mRNA vaccine, event rates for 23 serious health outcomes were not significantly higher for individuals 1 to 21 days after vaccination compared with similar individuals at 22 to 42 days after vaccination.”
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2784015
See my post #6
yep yep
You remind me of a film clip I saw today of a Jewish couple joking like they were on a vacation as they were being herded along by the Germans. I You won’t have a clue till they shut the door.
“ I’m not even going to attempt an estimate.
Providers are required by law to report events following vaccinations.
That they might not follow through on a case of anaphylaxis is not as likely as them not following through on a death.”
Got it.
You call this analysis garbage, but don’t have your own analysis to counter it. We should just buy into your gut feeling. I’m in awe to be in your exalted presence. It’s God-like how you can just “know” things.
As you so brilliantly point out, reporting is the law, and no one would EVER break the law, especially with tons of cash and perhaps even their livelihoods on the line. I’m sure if a doctor failed to report an adverse affect into the system, they would immediately be arrested and charged. Since that hasn’t happened even once (that I’m aware of), that means they are reporting 100% of the time per the law. Merrick Garland would never deviate from the law in favor of the goals of the left. Couldn’t happen.
Of course the VERY SAME laws exist for reporting anaphylaxis following jabs, but somehow, for some unknown reason, they would flout their reporting responsibilities there, but not with politically charged covid jabs. Did I get that right? The covid numbers are faaaar more trustworthy than any numbers ever before, per DannyTN, our resident expert.
Regarding the reporting frequency between anaphylaxis and deaths, you don’t have any data there either, so again, we should go with your gut. Nevermind the political pressure brought to bear in support first the jabs. Got it oh great one.
In the end you’ve proven what I implied. You’re full of crap and have no data at all, and even in light of data others have laid out, continue believing the official narrative.
Sucks to be you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.