How to verify for yourself that over 150,000 Americans have been killed by the COVID vaccines

substack.com ^ | 1/5/2022 | Steve Kirsch

[ransomnote]

PING

[CatOwner]

I thought it was 400,000? Neither the pro-Vaxx and anti-Vaxx sides are consistent with their stories.

[ransomnote]

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled How to verify for yourself that over 150,000 Americans have been killed by the COVID vaccines, CatOwner wrote:

I thought it was 400,000? Neither the pro-Vaxx and anti-Vaxx sides are consistent with their stories.

 

Different people using different methods. Kirsch pointing to someone else who thought the number was over 300K but Kirsch's own current estimate remains 150,000.

[taxcontrol]

Regardless of the numbers, the experimental gene therapy was never tested on animals and for that reason ALONE, should have never been granted EAU.

Further, the number of deaths reported should revoke EAU status.

[ChildOfThe60s]

I thought it was 400,000? Neither the pro-Vaxx and anti-Vaxx sides are consistent with their stories.

For the sake of discussion, let's assume the impossible is true - that VAERS is exactly accurate. What other vaccine in US history has not been pulled with a LOT fewer than 10,000 deaths and many times that *very serious* reactions? If memory serves, the Swine Flu vax was yanked after well less than 100 deaths. I clearly recall how we were all gonna die from that virus.

[SoConPubbie]

False comparison, meant to distract from the lies from the CDC, FDA, Fauci “the Fraud”, and Big Pharma.

[gitmo]

I stashed this away for later. I’m too busy and too tired to tear into the analysis right now. What I read looked well thought out.

[Impala64ssa]

Ping

[Deaf Smith]

bump

[reformedliberal]

https://www.brighteon.com/72f2d8d5-0d32-474f-af5e-85ef8d227475

Situation Update, Jan 4, 2022: GLOBAL ALERT as 10 million people PER DAY are set on irreversible countdown to VACCINE DEATH

Much of this is still in progress.

Malone called it a “mass extinction event”.

Reports continue from all types of sources, world-wide.

Most humans have the attention span of a goldfish.

[Worldtraveler once upon a time]

— “Neither the pro-Vaxx and anti-Vaxx sides are consistent with their stories.”

Re-posting this info:

As of 2 January 2022:

For the world:

( 5,440,715 “global deaths) / 7,917,528,778 global population ) x 100 = 0.0687%

Less than seven one-hunredths of one percent “global deaths” from Covid over two years.

https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/

For the US....

( 825,819 “U.S. Deaths” over two years / 331,002,651 U.S. population ) x 100 = 0.249%

About 25 one-hunredths of one percent, given the rule of thumb that about one percent of a population dies off each year.

If one accepts any of the resultant percentages for Covid-19 deaths as relates to various populations as reported from official sources, then the “event” isn't as the hysteria warrants.

Then, with the VAERS system and its European counterpart, those numbers cannot be validated either, until time passes. Various pre-Covid assessments of the VAERS system can be used to estimate, but after two years so much seems just estimate and data manipulation.

What is certain is that there is no consistency — as you observe — in any of the “event” from the WHO's April 2020 directions through the often-vacillating advice of CDC and FDA, through until today.

G One FR comment validated the CDC as a rubber stamp, and stated six. Others into the hundreds of thousands. Here is what CAN be said. Using the examples of thalidomide and Vioxx, real drug damages' numbers will not be known until years from now. I will try to trust a drug or any other product or service at such time as liability shielding is withdrawn and the tort system can assist in discovery and verification. Until then, it's politics all the way down.

[ConservativeDude]

I think the death penalty number for a vax is 50.

So you are quite right.

The vaccine protocol was utterly disregarded this time.

[DannyTN]

That’s not proof.

Using an underreporting factor for anaphylaxis to extrapolate deaths is a HUGE and likely wrong assumption.

And even the underreporting factor they are using is an extrapolated assumption.

[azkathy]

Bookmarking good info from Steve kirsch

[Jane Long]

IATFR$$.

Thanks for the post and the ping.

[BlueMondaySkipper]

“ That’s not proof.

Using an underreporting factor for anaphylaxis to extrapolate deaths is a HUGE and likely wrong assumption.

And even the underreporting factor they are using is an extrapolated assumption.”

Ok then, let’s see your estimate. Please show your work!!!

While you’re at it, please explain why an established underreporting factor for anaphylaxis is the wrong one to use for covid. Again, show your work!

Thank you so much!!!

[DannyTN]

I’m not even going to attempt an estimate.
Providers are required by law to report events following vaccinations.
That they might not follow through on a case of anaphylaxis is not as likely as them not following through on a death.

[brookwood]

“I stashed this away for later. I’m too busy and too tired to tear into the analysis right now. What I read looked well thought out.”
It’s the same pile of crap in a different box, from Steve Kirsch courtesy of Ransomnote. Don’t waste your time.

[brookwood]

Steve Kirsch is a demented crackpot. His asinine formula uses the rate of allergic reaction to the vaccine, which he states is 2.47 per 10,000 vaccinations. But in the article he cites, it says ALL THOSE WHO HAD AN ALLERGIC REACTION RECOVERED. THE NUMBER OF DEATHS WAS ZERO. WHAT IS IT WITH THIS JERK THAT HE DOESN’T UNDERSTAND WHAT ZERO MEANS?????

“The remaining 2% reported some allergic symptoms; however, severe reactions consistent with anaphylaxis occurred at a rate of 2.47 per 10 000 vaccinations. All individuals with anaphylaxis recovered without shock or endotracheal intubation.”