Booster efficacy (or lack thereof) visualization (7 minute video)

substack.com ^ | 1/4/2022 | Steve Kirsch

[ransomnote]

This video has a nice visualization of how well the booster works over time. This is based on UK government data. No surprises here: the booster is mostly helping the virus.

Steve Kirsch 22 hr ago

 

One thing that the vaccine mandates seem to accomplish is to make it easier for the virus to infect you and to prolong the pandemic. This of course is exactly the opposite of what we are being told.

This video provides a nice visualization of the effect of the booster shots over time.

I’m not sure who made the video, but the graphs are consistent with data I’ve seen elsewhere.

---

ransomnote: Here's an image from the video.

'Vaccinated' people broken down into age groups. In gereral, the 'vaccinated' show limited efficacy, well below the manufacturer's claimed 95% (Pfizer) or 91% (Moderna) initially, and most decline with each passing week to ultimately become negative efficacy. Those with negative efficacy (bars in red) are more likely to get Covid post 'vaccination' than if they had never gotten the 'shot'.

[ransomnote]

PING

[Former Proud Canadian]

https://www.bitchute.com/video/Q5DjWbyYdvnt/

Better Link

[Albion Wilde]

Interesting; however, the the most vulnerable of the 70-and-older groups already died of it in the year after the pandemic broke. So the elderly survivors are more of a "selected" group than the young-to-middle aged groups.

The elderly were incentivized to take the vaxx first, spurring an earlier wave of deaths; but the other groups have just recently been subjected to mandates, making their susceptibility more acute.

The elderly also lead more isolated lives to begin with, and do not have as many forced interactions or intimate interactions as the young-to-middle aged groups.

So I don't think those positives claimed for the elderly are a valid comparison.

"There are lies, damned lies, and statistics." —Mark Twain