Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EXCLUSIVE: Harry and Meghan raised less than $50,000 for their Archewell charity in its first year, spending MORE money on legal fees to dissolve their original 'Sussex Royal' UK foundation, IRS filings reveal
Daily Mail ^ | 4 January 2022 | Josh Boswell

Posted on 01/04/2022 4:53:37 PM PST by Trillian

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle spent more money on legal fees for their charities than they raised in 2020, filings reveal.

The Sussexes' US charity Archewell told the IRS in December that it raised less than $50,000 in 2020 — only opening a bank account last January.

And documents for their UK charity Sussex Royal, which changed its name to MWX Foundation in 2020 and is currently being dissolved, show that between June 2020 and June 2021 spent more than $55,000 on legal fees including attorneys' costs for wrapping up the nonprofit.

Meghan and Harry's charities have been mired in controversy since their launch, revealing family divisions and were hit with a UK watchdog investigation and criticism over their use of opaque and secretive Delaware corporations.

UK Companies House filings show the defunct British charity had more than $380,000 in its accounts in 2020, and spent at least $55,600 on attorneys, including about $35,000 to Harbottle & Lewis and $20,600 to an unidentified law firm.

The Sussexes' American charity Archewell was set up in April 2020, but did not open its bank account until January 2021 their lawyers say. Archewell received its first deposit the following month, according to the foundation's filings.

Charities are required to file a public 'Form 990' with the IRS each year which details their finances. Most charities that receive less than $50,000 are only required to file a 'postcard' with some very limited information.

This month, Harry and Meghan's charity told the IRS its gross receipts for 2020 were less than $50,000.

The lack of donations to the former royals' charity last year could come as a surprise after news of its launch made headlines around the world in April 2020.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: grifters; harry; meghan; royalgrifters; whocares; whoops
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: EEGator

I’d bet Harry is really -—— whipped, too.


21 posted on 01/04/2022 5:31:55 PM PST by laplata
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EEGator
I’ll never get over him marrying that trollop.

Wow. Never? Really? Sucks to be you. (with the luxury of caring about something to irrelevant).

22 posted on 01/04/2022 5:33:15 PM PST by workerbee (==)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: laplata

I don’t doubt that.
No ***** is that good.


23 posted on 01/04/2022 5:34:51 PM PST by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: EEGator
I’ll never get over him marrying that trollop.
He could of had almost any woman in the world and he picks her.
It boggles my mind. I’m no one and I wouldn’t marry her.

You win the internet today!

24 posted on 01/04/2022 5:35:03 PM PST by Albion Wilde (If science can’t be questioned, it’s not science anymore, it’s propaganda. --Aaron Rodgers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation
based on my trip there several years ago, if he prefers dark meat, there's plenty to be had there, mostly influx from former colonies.

Please tell me you didn't just say this.

25 posted on 01/04/2022 5:35:31 PM PST by workerbee (==)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: workerbee

You’re right, I should be an anonymous trash talking coward like you.


26 posted on 01/04/2022 5:35:56 PM PST by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

That’s right. Lol


27 posted on 01/04/2022 5:37:08 PM PST by laplata
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: EEGator
You think no decent British woman would want to be married to a Prince of England?

While quite the man whore, Harry actually was rejected by two women he went with for some time: a Brit, Cressida Bonas; and a white South African, Chelsea Davies. They were said to be put off by his neuroticism and the difficulties of being a royal in the tabloid atmosphere of the British media. Harry is not the only young person to have been horrified at a young age by the death of Diana, whose death involved her and her lover and driver being chased by paparazzi through a dark tunnel. Being hounded by the media while dating Harry must have been a daunting prospect.

28 posted on 01/04/2022 5:49:06 PM PST by Albion Wilde (If science can’t be questioned, it’s not science anymore, it’s propaganda. --Aaron Rodgers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde

I would have just stayed a man whore instead of marrying her.


29 posted on 01/04/2022 5:51:37 PM PST by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: EEGator; workerbee

Yeah, workerbee was right on this one.


30 posted on 01/04/2022 5:52:18 PM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Trillian

Ah following in the steps of KAOS...a Delaware corporation for tax purposes.


31 posted on 01/04/2022 5:52:35 PM PST by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trillian

Guess being an Ex Royal doesn’t pay as well........


32 posted on 01/04/2022 5:58:45 PM PST by Lockbox (politicians, they all seemed like game show hosts to me.... Sting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

Not if he is a creep like Halfwit. In this day and age, British women in his circle have plenty of other options. They don’t need to marry a tempermental, immature dunce who happens to be a prince and a member of the world’s most dysfunctional family to boot.

In any case, did you see any suitable British women marry Halfwit, or even get engaged to him? No, you didn’t.


33 posted on 01/04/2022 5:59:59 PM PST by Cecily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Chode

You’re correct....they don’t have a thing to offer. I think Harry thought he could generate funds just by showing up as he did in the UK......neither realize how much they’re disliked here as well as overseas.


34 posted on 01/04/2022 6:03:33 PM PST by caww ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: laplata

Once the money and press ebb down....Megan will find a new guy to entertain the media with.


35 posted on 01/04/2022 6:06:00 PM PST by caww ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: EvilCapitalist

Even better, he should have stayed single.


36 posted on 01/04/2022 6:06:12 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: caww

.


37 posted on 01/04/2022 6:06:59 PM PST by Chode (there is no fall back position, there's no rally point, there is no LZ... we're on our own. #FJB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: EEGator
an anonymous trash talking coward like you.

Project much?

38 posted on 01/04/2022 6:10:33 PM PST by workerbee (==)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: caww

I can see that. She’s an opportunist.

I hope Harry sees his grandmother before she dies.


39 posted on 01/04/2022 6:12:21 PM PST by laplata
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Trillian
Did their "charity" really not raise a lot of money or are they hiding money from the irs?

Plenty of "revenue". It is all going for travel, security, salaries, promotion, dining . . . "overhead".

The money goes to charity. That is, if there's any money left over, and there never is. -- Carole Lombard as Irene Bullock in "My Man Godfrey"
40 posted on 01/04/2022 6:13:36 PM PST by Dr. Sivana ("There are only men and women."-- George Gilder, Sexual Suicide, 1973)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson