[semimojo]

The under-reporting factor of forty-one is the average magnitude of under-reporting that occurs in the VAERS system for the most serious adverse events following vaccination.

I love the faux precision of this made up statistic.

[ransomnote]

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled CDC is hiding the true number of Myocarditis Cases in Covid-19 Vaccinated Teens, semimojo wrote:

The under-reporting factor of forty-one is the average magnitude of under-reporting that occurs in the VAERS system for the most serious adverse events following vaccination.

I love the faux precision of this made up statistic.

*

I thought you would. You loved Fauci's statistical lies with a passion. 95% efficacy really means the 'vaccination' only reduces your risk of getting Covid by .8 of one percent. You loved that, too, didn't you?

You probably found Pfizer's 'faux precision' irresistable. Pfizer elected not to test people with symtoms of Covid and therefore just didn't count their illness in their trial data. Their faux 95% 'efficacy' stat would have been %19 percent if they had, you know, checked to see who got sick after the 'vax' instead of 'sampling' those who got ill, testing some, and excluding others entirely by not testing them but instead designating them 'suspected covid'. 

Boy the plandemic has lots of faux precision for you to enjoy. I didn't think you'd go for Kirsch's data though because he outlines how he arrived at his estimate so that people understand where the number is from and if they disagree, can dispute it with their own estimate etc. Not like your hero, Fauci, who doesn't say where he gets his data and CERTAINLY doesn't do the math to make sure people understand. I mean, HOW could he sell a 'vaccine' that actually only reduces risk of illness for  .8 of one percent FOR TWO MONTHS, and then grows smaller and smaller until the vax increases risk of illness? Not even he could sell that!