Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DIRTYSECRET

South Dakota went 62% for Trump last round.

If they elect a Democrat senator (which would be the same as voting for Biden, given the split in the senate) it would be evidence of widespread voter fraud.


3 posted on 01/02/2022 6:44:47 AM PST by Brookhaven (The dystopian future is now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Brookhaven

Absolutely.

I thinkbthis article is a RINO spin item.


10 posted on 01/02/2022 6:57:26 AM PST by ZULU (HOOVER, FREEH, MUELLER, COMEY, WRAY, SUCCESSION OF STATISTS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Brookhaven
South Dakota went 62% for Trump last round. If they elect a Democrat senator (which would be the same as voting for Biden, given the split in the senate) it would be evidence of widespread voter fraud.

Sooooo....what is the South Dakota Republican Committee doing NOW to stop the steal in 2022 and beyond?

What is the RNC doing NOW to stop the steal in all the states?

16 posted on 01/02/2022 7:21:22 AM PST by JesusIsLord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Brookhaven

Appears they like split tickets. This is the state of McGovern after all.


21 posted on 01/02/2022 7:43:17 AM PST by napscoordinator (Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016 democratic )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Brookhaven

“South Dakota went 62% for Trump last round.

If they elect a Democrat senator (which would be the same as voting for Biden, given the split in the senate) it would be evidence of widespread voter fraud.”

Agree, this isn’t 2018, when half the country is ready to take Trump’s head off because of his (fake) collusion with Russia.

Republicans have ZERO to worry about in any state that is marginally Red or better, providing they don’t allow the Democrat fraud machine to take over.

Other than that, someone is playing us at Newsmax, not sure why though.


23 posted on 01/02/2022 7:52:11 AM PST by BobL (I shop at Walmart and eat at McDonald's, I just don't tell anyone, like most here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Brookhaven

🤦👎


24 posted on 01/02/2022 8:01:01 AM PST by hawkaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Brookhaven

South Dakota would probably elect anything with an R next to it in 2022.


31 posted on 01/02/2022 8:38:32 AM PST by Nextrush (FREEDOM IS EVERYBODYS BUSINESS, REMEMBER PASTOR NIEMOLLER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Brookhaven
If they elect a Democrat senator (which would be the same as voting for Biden, given the split in the senate) it would be evidence of widespread voter fraud.

When I was stationed In So Dak back in the 70s, I never met anyone that admitted voting for George McGovern, yet he kept getting re-elected. Either vote fraud has been endemic for a long time, or they are closet libs.

37 posted on 01/02/2022 9:00:42 AM PST by The Sons of Liberty (“Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction". It is dying on Our Watch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Brookhaven; Berosus; DIRTYSECRET; laconic; cotton1706; DMD13; ZULU; Chewbarkah; Jim Noble; ...
South Dakota went 62% for Trump last round.

If they elect a Democrat senator (which would be the same as voting for Biden, given the split in the senate) it would be evidence of widespread voter fraud.

I did the South Dakota analysis of Obama 2008 by county and Biden 2020 by county.

Of the 65 South Dakota counties, only 4 counties turned out more for Joek than for Bammy [Custer/103%, Lincoln/139%, Minnehaha/102% and Pennington/116%].

Three others turned out 90% of Bammy's 2008 record totals [Hughes/97%, Lawrence/92% and Oglala Lakota/95%].

The rest of the counties ranged from mid-40s to high 80s of the Obama 2008 turnout.

I'm thinking South Dakota has swung permanently.

South Dakota 2020 US Senate

              Mike Rounds    Dan Ahlers	
Party	      Republican      Democrat
Popular vote	276,232	      143,987
Percentage	  66%	        34%

South Dakota 2020 US House at-large seat

    incumbent Dusty Johnson  Randy Luallin
              Republican      Libertarian		
                321,984	       75,748
          	  81%           19%	

Democrat Party primary 2020

No candidate was able to gather enough signatures to qualify for the Democratic primary. According to state party chairman Randy Seiler, Democratic canvassing efforts were hampered by the coronavirus outbreak.

Candidates

Failed to qualify
Whitney Raver, small business owner
Brian Wirth, financial crime specialist

Withdrawn

Ellee Spawn, resource coordinator

43 posted on 01/02/2022 10:58:27 AM PST by kiryandil (China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson