Replies

And here you were blasting someone for referencing JFK Jr, and yet you quote - liberally I might add - from the thoroughly corrupt .govs and mockingbird media.

You push the police state agenda too clumsily. It's why nobody believes anything you say.

— “You push the police state agenda too clumsily.” So wrote one to “blueplum.”

I agree, Sirius Lee. Mr. bueplum wrote to me, “Like any republican conservative, I have no issues with vaccines in general and for adults in particular.” That is clever argumentation, excepting that others of the same political leanings — as I have — disagree with Mr. bueplum. Rather, by citing the comment above, I too conclude Mr. bueplum does “push” the state agenda with such zeal as to convince me as he wrote, “I don't care what he [Kennedy] has to say about Fauci, that's Fauci’s problem.” But then Mr. bueplum argues for Fauci’s position, so this seems disingenuous.

Mr. bueplum speaks about “a common sense approach to disease control based on facts on the ground.”

“Facts on the ground” should include issues of data collection and manipulation, mischaraterization, changing goalposts and word definitions throughout the last two years “to lfatten the curve,” and massively inflated AND deflated data as simple data anomalies demonstrate, along with my favorite “from” and “with” and “presumed” classifications for causes of death, a taxonomy only a Fauci could love.

Here's a fact on the ground. Official fact.

Data as of 29 December 2021

https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/region/china

( 4,849 reported and “official” deaths in China / 1,439,323,776 total population ) x 100 = 0.00337 %

Quite an anomaly among the "official" data. Facts on the ground.

Sirius Lee rightly observes, "...you quote - liberally I might add - from the thoroughly corrupt .govs and mockingbird media." Also part of the facts on the ground.

you responded to post 22. Post 22 was an article about texas shortage of monoclonals. Define what part of the article is ‘corrupt govs and mockingbird media’