One thing Scott Adams hasn’t mentioned is the role of intuition.
Interpreting data is merely following instruction. Following instruction is the lowest function of intelligence, after intuition and experience.
I’m generally careful to describe ideas as low IQ rather than an individual. Without a doubt, Adams’ posts here are low IQ.
Wisdom would dictate Adam admit he’s wrong and present the reasons why rather than tying himself in word salad and definition arguing knots.
This is why Clif High is so good. He believes and has evidence that humans as a collective are prophetic albeit not consciously. That's what "intuition" is in a nutshell. It leaves the door open for further learning and observation. Mr Scott with his closed Western mind would never believe we are all connected through morphogenesis.