I read it as soon as you posted it last night. It’s a logical evaluation of President Trump’s position on the vaccines. I stayed up too late to read it and didn’t digest it well beyond my overall positive impression. I’ll read it again after dinner.
I fell asleep thinking that it wouldn’t be good optics for PDJT to come out against the existing jabs and then strongly support the military’s version. Being consistent and supporting both, with perhaps a stronger endorsement of the military’s, would attract less negative press and be more likely to win approval for the remaining jab-hesitant. I’m not sure how that reasoning holds up in the light of day, but it made sense to me at 1:30 a.m.
I was thinking this morning that if President Trump said “don’t get jabbed, they’re dangerous and don’t work” instantly the entire enemy apparatus would be accusing him of mass deaths and the reason why every unjabbed person is unjabbed. Thus people who are still undecided about stuff (a dwindling number for sure) might be influenced. The media/dem drumbeat of “Trump killed millions” would be deafening and nonstop.
I think he has said what he’s been saying for several reasons.