Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

University of California, Irvine Professor Suing School Over Covid-19 Vaccine Mandate
dailyexpose.uk ^ | 12/21/2021 | CAPTAINDARETOFLY

Posted on 12/21/2021 6:07:53 PM PST by ransomnote

A professor at the University of California, Irvine (UCI), is suing the school over its implementation of a Covid-19 vaccine mandate.

Dr Aaron Kheriaty, a professor at the university, said that at first, he did not suspect anything strange going on. He said that over time he noticed a clear pattern of behaviour from public health officials that were steering away from traditional medical ethics.

The professor stated that the biggest red flag to him was the fact that there was this sudden, huge push for everyone to get vaccinated, including those with minimal risk of infection. All of a sudden, the pandemic became about compliance rather than keeping the public safe and healthy.

Rather than staying silent about what he was witnessing, Dr Kheriaty decided to speak up, and as a result, UCI punished him with a suspension.

Dr Kheriaty, who is a professor of psychiatry and director of the UCI Health Medical Ethics Program, said: “I had to stand up and try to do something about it.

“I knew that I would wake up in the morning and not have a clear conscience” if he did nothing about it, he added.

Additionally, Kheriaty revealed that he and his family all contracted Covid-19 last year, based on test results that they received. Everyone who tested positive recovered quickly and none had to be hospitalised.

“It was, for me, actually a very liberating experience afterwards because I didn’t have to worry about the illness anymore,” Kheriaty explained. “I knew the science on natural immunity.”

Of course, medical establishments and experts around the world now deny the existence and science behind natural immunity to further the vaccine agenda. However, Kheriaty stated that he knew the truth of the matter.

“I knew that at that point, I was among the safest people to be around,” Kheriaty added about the natural immunity he obtained post-infection. “I didn’t have to worry about transmitting the infection to my patients.”

However, the professor still complied with his hospital’s mask mandates and other covid guidelines but knew that the whole time he was not a risk to others.

Although, as soon as the vaccine mandate was introduced, that is where Dr Kheriaty drew the line: Enough was enough.

As a result of the mandate being introduced at UCI, the professor felt that he had no option other than to sue the school since he was not willing to comply with the medical tyranny.

“What kind of discriminatory policies do we have in place that are excluding someone like me from the workplace when I’m 99.8 percent protected against reinfection whereas someone who got the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, by the company’s own data that they submitted to the FDA, is 67 percent protective against COVID infection?” Kheriaty wants to know.

After researching data surrounding infection and vaccines, he decided that he would not be complying with the vaccine mandate. Now, the professor is committed to fighting for medical freedom on behalf of everyone else.

You can watch the interview with Dr Kheriaty here:

Jan Jekielek on Twitter
 


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: anthonyfauci; covidstooges; obamacare; vaccinemandates

1 posted on 12/21/2021 6:07:53 PM PST by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cathi; Unrepentant VN Vet; metmom; Fractal Trader; SecAmndmt; bagster; doc maverick; ...

PING


2 posted on 12/21/2021 6:08:32 PM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

The so-called vaccines do not prevent the spread of covid.

There is no justification for making them mandatory.


3 posted on 12/21/2021 6:27:21 PM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

If there was overwhelming evidence they had a say, 99% Effectiveness in stopping the spread, transmission in sickness of Covid, Then they might have a case as to why they are beneficial and should be mandated, but in certain limited cases only, such as the medical field.

That is how they were marketed, however, now we know none of those things are true and they offer much less protection than originally claimed and that protection only lasts, at best, 3 to 6 months. They don’t stop the spread they don’t stop the sickness they might have helped with the original variant in the most at risk people, but that’s it. Even then, I believe that is highly debatable in questionable


4 posted on 12/21/2021 6:43:41 PM PST by matt04 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

‘sudden huge push’

well, look at May 2021 numbers. With almost a million hospitalized as Delta hit the US, of course a push for vaccinations especially after the vaccine showed excellent results against Delta: “a “breakthrough infection” of COVID-19... occurred in fewer than 1,200 of more than 853,000 people hospitalized for COVID-19 in May.”

https://www.webmd.com/vaccines/covid-19-vaccine/news/20210629/almost-all-us-covid-19-deaths-now-in-the-unvaccinated
.


5 posted on 12/21/2021 7:24:56 PM PST by blueplum ("...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson