“Trump was the best thing the Republicans ever had.. Now a bunch of deluded “conservatives” are pissing on him because they don’t believe 96 percent of the medical community.”
Thank you. One of the “corrupted” medical community here (practicing physician — MD and a PhD — so I’m an “elitist” according to some at this site) who follows the literature (all written by “conspirators”, evidently) on COVID very closely, just so I can speak to my patients and advise them wisely. I didn’t know all of us physicians were conspiring — I’ve missed the memos, I guess. Trump is right re the vaccines. He saved millions of lives by Operation Warp Speed. And, I don’t believe in mandatory vaccination, but the choice of getting the vaccine is a wise one, especially if you’re in a high risk category. [cue the “you’re a terrible, evil doctor, I feel sorry for your patients” response — I won’t respond to it]
Keep up the good fight.
There are wise and not-so-wise MDs. I have one in my family who had their entire family double vaccinated. The MD even took the vaccine after having had COVID. Now they catch everything that's going around. My daughter, who is not an MD, took the ivermectin protocol after contracting the virus, as did her family, including her 80 y.o. FIL, who had had COVID to. They all made relatively quick and full recoveries, though the FIL also went for monoclonal treatment. They've still not taken the vaccine but rely on natural immunity to protect them and are all doing well.
The MD family's youngest (a 13 y.o. boy) is traveling to another city once a week for chemotherapy to control his immune system, which turned on him shortly after taking the second injection. Worse, they say that there is a 90% chance he will need a bone-marrow transplant.
They were all perfectly healthy before the vaccinations. Now their lives have been changed forever. And we still don't know what the outcome will be. The average cost of a bone-marrow transplant is over one million dollars.
Thanks for posting your creds. Very interesting post too.
My MD literally prescribes 10 nutritional supplements for me,He checks them out on WebMD before he decides. Everything now said to boost immunity, I’ve taken every morning for 50 years. Read the right books back then, long before I met him.
Anyway....at the beginning of the outbreak, I had an appointment with him. He looked at me from a proper social distance and asked whether I’d had the vax.
“I was going to ask you about that,” I said. “But you’re a doctor and you have to say yes.” At this point we’re both LOL.
He said, “”You look very healthy to me. Come back in six months.”
I am very healthy., though old enough to be considered “high risk.” Only health problem was cause by MD’s and it’s a corneal transplant wrecked with wrong ointment prescribed. Need a new transplant next year. Terrified.
The age/high risk link is infuriating. I’m healthier than most people half my age.
As for the vax, wasn’t going to get a “conditionally approved” vax. Then Pfizer was FDA approved. So I got one. A week later the head of Pfizer left the company and took a leadership position at the FDA. Did NOT pass the smell test, so I found a book on the FDA. Bunch of liars and cheats in it for the money. Regret taking that vax, though no side effects, not even a red jab site. Hope it didn’t compromise what I considered my natural immunity. Most assuredly not getting another shot.
Thanks for posting your creds. Very interesting post too.
My MD literally prescribes 10 nutritional supplements for me,He checks them out on WebMD before he decides. Everything now said to boost immunity, I’ve taken every morning for 50 years. Read the right books back then, long before I met him.
Anyway....at the beginning of the outbreak, I had an appointment with him. He looked at me from a proper social distance and asked whether I’d had the vax.
“I was going to ask you about that,” I said. “But you’re a doctor and you have to say yes.” At this point we’re both LOL.
He said, “”You look very healthy to me. Come back in six months.”
I am very healthy., though old enough to be considered “high risk.” Only health problem was cause by MD’s and it’s a corneal transplant wrecked with wrong ointment prescribed. Need a new transplant next year. Terrified.
The age/high risk link is infuriating. I’m healthier than most people half my age.
As for the vax, wasn’t going to get a “conditionally approved” vax. Then Pfizer was FDA approved. So I got one. A week later the head of Pfizer left the company and took a leadership position at the FDA. Did NOT pass the smell test, so I found a book on the FDA. Bunch of liars and cheats in it for the money. Regret taking that vax, though no side effects, not even a red jab site. Hope it didn’t compromise what I considered my natural immunity. Most assuredly not getting another shot.
So if you are not high risk, then it's still wise?
The occurence of both, a) “the shot” and b) a negative effect upon enough people (one or more adverse reactions, including death), has been observed by now, to be significant.
There is a developing corrilary, that the immune system of some people, is “reset and weakened,” such that symptoms related to past illnesses, are relived, and such people also “seem to catch every bug that comes along since ‘the shot.’”
The theory of what mRNA is supposed to do, however “the shot” was [we presume] intended to function, appears to not be so-purely focused in actual activity (lack of uniformity in application); once injected -— some of the chem introduced, having failed to miss the sweet spot of muscle and then lymph material(s). (Assuming that a person actually has a meaty portion of axillary in good enough shape for the task.) Some of the “the shot” making its way too quickly into the trunk of blood circulation.
It will not surprise to find myocarditis statistically tied back to that failure to hit a good target.
BTW, “the science” and “because . . . science” were previously “the scientific method” that was more thoughtful, thorough, and inclined toward more intense failure analysis - than what now passes too often as “the literature.”
To wit: There is now plenty of information to cause a thoughtful person interested in fixing problems, to spend more time on where the *idealism of ‘the shot,’* needs to be challenged.
BTW, almost every so-called face mask that is being used in public, functions mostly as a diffuser, along with varying levels of efficiency re droplet / material capture (filtering). Assuming at least 2 layers of fiber / fabric, such masks “work at filtering” by changing the direction of airflow, that causes some droplet / material to fail to make that change in direction . . . and be captured / trapped by some mask filament (sometimes coated with a “tacky” substance).
Such face masks offer only *some portion* of protection, and might assist on some occasions, with *some portion* of prevention. In other words, such public face masks might give a person an edge in the person’s favor - provided that such public face masks are properly worn and maintained.
But in general, such public face masks are mostly functioning as viral load diffusers. IMHO.