Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill O’Reilly: I Had to Console Trump After MAGA Fans Booed Him for Getting Vaccine Booster
Daily Beast ^ | Dec 21 | Jamie Ross

Posted on 12/21/2021 8:12:57 AM PST by RandFan

Bill O’Reilly has revealed that he had to console Donald Trump after he was booed by his own supporters for getting a vaccine booster shot. Trump told MAGA fans that he’d had his COVID-19 booster during Sunday’s final stop on the “History Tour” he co-headlined with the disgraced ex-Fox News star.

The revelation prompted a chorus of boos and jeers from anti-vaxxers in the crowd. In an interview with Dan Abrams on NewsNation, O’Reilly said Trump phoned him after the event and was apparently hurt by the reaction.

“I told him that today, he called me,” said O’Reilly. “I said ‘This is good for you, this is good that people see another side of you, not a political side, you told the truth, you believe in the vax, your administration did it, and you should take credit for it, because it did save, I don’t know, hundreds of thousands of lives.’” The ex-Fox News star later said Trump that will definitely run in 2024, telling Abrams: “I’m trying to tell President Trump, run on your record. He’s going to run again, all right.”

(Excerpt) Read more at thedailybeast.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: dailybeast
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-147 next last
To: RandFan

Trump is 75 and overweight. So what he chose to get the vax.


121 posted on 12/21/2021 11:09:34 AM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueStateRightist
...but the choice of getting the vaccine is a wise one, especially if you’re in a high risk category.

So if you are not high risk, then it's still wise?

122 posted on 12/21/2021 11:11:24 AM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Subcutaneous Fishstick Blues

Wow, nice little pointless diatribe.

You don’t need to follow the MSM to conclude Alex Jones is a Hack.

By his OWN admissions under oath he lied, knows he lied and did it anyway, or maybe you missed that entire liable trial he lost over Sandy Hook.

That has nothing to do with any MSM talking points that has to do with being able to actually ready and comprehend the english language, and actual court records.

Alex Jones is a hack.. that’s it. He knows he can throw red meat to a certain segment and they will eat it up, and that will keep getting him a paycheck. He is no different that say the Young Turks on the left... exact same schtick just different sides of the political aisle.

Just because the person playing that role is doing so for the political side you tend to agree with doesn’t mean that person is not a hack. Alex Jones is as BEST white noise, he’s not advancing or improving any cause, regardless of what his fans might think, any more than Rachel Maddow does.

The are hacks who just preach to their choir knowing they will gobble anything they say up, because they want to.

If you enjoy listening to Alex, by all means go ahead, but don’t think for one minute what you are getting is a fact based and thoughtful information. Just like if you liKE rachel maddow, then by all means watch her too, but don’t think for one minute you are getting fact based and thoughtful information.

The failure of certain segments of the population to recognize flagrant propaganda, and hucksters who capitalize on them, is probably one of the biggest scams and shames of America today.

We are a nation so utterly saturated in media and messaging yet so few truly can see through it.

The fact Alex Jones still has a career at all after what he did surrounding Sand Hook shows exactly how poor our public schools are at teaching critical thought and independent analysis.

He didn’t just have a momentary lapse in judgement, he knowingly can repeatedly told complete fabrications to attempt to pad his own pockets on the backs of dead children... He is no different than the left wing hacks who tried to use those same children’s bodies to push more gun control before they were even cold. They are BOTH MORALLY REPUGNANT PEOPLE...

And if that to you is an MSM talking point, then please point me to the MSM source you have heard it from?!?

Because lord knows I sure haven’t seen anyone in the MSM on either side of the aisle speak that truth.


123 posted on 12/21/2021 11:22:55 AM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

He has jumped through every hoop the DeBlasios of the world have set up..

Something tells me he still wouldn’t be welcomed in NYC by the circus masters.

But, he could eat out.


124 posted on 12/21/2021 11:24:33 AM PST by delchiante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Nea Wood

Yeah. The position of the lefties sure does float along with the political wind, doesn’t it?

This whole situation is like the largest, most complex flowchart with all the combinations and permutations of circumstance you could think of... and it all reduces to one single block [get vaccine]. That’s the only way out of the flow. Until you get there, and you see that another block has been added [get booster]

This situation likely couldn’t have existed with Trump in office. It appears that someone went all in to make sure he wasn’t. And the jig is up, really. Everyone knows our elections are a joke and likely have been for many years. But this flowchart was important enough to go all in for. And you know what? It’s looking like this same scenario has played out in other countries too. I’m still looking into that.


125 posted on 12/21/2021 11:28:52 AM PST by Sarcazmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

O’Reilly is bloviating (his favorite word) that he consoled and advised Trump, I doubt Trump needs BOR for either. O’Reilly thinks he’s that important but he’s not.


126 posted on 12/21/2021 11:45:25 AM PST by tina07 (In loving memory of my father,WWII Vet. CBI 10/16/42-12/17/45, d. 11/1/85 )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

Yeah. Heard a few wild ones in my day.

However, looking at what has been going on these last 24 months... this is NOT operations under usual conditions.

All I’m saying is for me, everything is on the table for consideration. No blind, faith based belief either way but go ahead and give me the theory to think about. I’m not dismissing anything out of hand right now.

Sometimes... just sometimes, they really are out to get you.
I have learned SO much about the psychology of groups these last two years. Probably would have already known if I had paid attention in college, but whatever.


127 posted on 12/21/2021 11:58:04 AM PST by Sarcazmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: dforest

Fair points.

I dont think Trump has even been all that good with the details or counter arguments.


128 posted on 12/21/2021 11:59:32 AM PST by Jonny7797
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Guess what crowd this sounds like:

Joe Biden questioned whether a vaccine would be “real.”

In August, Biden suggested the vaccines might be unsafe, saying “if and when the vaccine comes, it’s not likely to go through all the tests…and trials that are needed to be done.”

In September, Biden legitimized those who were questioning the safety of the vaccines, saying, “who’s going to take the shot? Are you going to be the first one to say sign me up?”

Days later, then-Biden Press Secretary Symone Sanders repeatedly refused to say whether Biden would take the COVID vaccine if it was approved before election day.

A week later, Biden said the American people “should not have confidence” in the vaccine unless it met his campaign’s specific criteria.

In September, Kamala Harris refused to say whether she would take a vaccine approved before Election Day: “I think that’s going to be an issue for all of us.”

Harris said that scientists would not have the “last word” in approving the vaccine, and suggested a vaccine may not be effective.

Ron Klain, now White House Chief of Staff, tweeted: “When you read how Team Trump played politics with testing it makes you wonder how they will handle vaccines?”

https://gop.com/research/democrats-repeatedly-undermined-the-vaccine/


129 posted on 12/21/2021 12:03:42 PM PST by Pelham (Q is short for quack )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bhl

👍


130 posted on 12/21/2021 12:05:07 PM PST by Pelham (Q is short for quack )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

Yep. It is simply inconceivable to me that a thinking brain could hold this position then do a 180 on on it and join “Team Pfizer”. Yet a political party seems to have pulled this off on their constituents.

Guess I better start conceiving it though, because it just happened.


131 posted on 12/21/2021 12:12:13 PM PST by Sarcazmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: alstewartfan

“Trump has NATURAL IMMUNITY.”

Probably not. When you use monoclonal antibodies your immune system won’t learn to develop antibodies from your case of covid. The MAbs kill off the virus before that can happen. Any immunity that Trump has comes from vaccination. If you beat back covid without MAbs you will gain natural immunity, but you also run the risk of severe illness or death.


132 posted on 12/21/2021 12:18:07 PM PST by Pelham (Q is short for quack )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

It’s the Q cult as well.


133 posted on 12/21/2021 12:21:15 PM PST by Pelham (Q is short for quack )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: BlueStateRightist; jonrick46; ifinnegan; LilFarmer; Jane Long; ransomnote

The occurence of both, a) “the shot” and b) a negative effect upon enough people (one or more adverse reactions, including death), has been observed by now, to be significant.

There is a developing corrilary, that the immune system of some people, is “reset and weakened,” such that symptoms related to past illnesses, are relived, and such people also “seem to catch every bug that comes along since ‘the shot.’”

The theory of what mRNA is supposed to do, however “the shot” was [we presume] intended to function, appears to not be so-purely focused in actual activity (lack of uniformity in application); once injected -— some of the chem introduced, having failed to miss the sweet spot of muscle and then lymph material(s). (Assuming that a person actually has a meaty portion of axillary in good enough shape for the task.) Some of the “the shot” making its way too quickly into the trunk of blood circulation.

It will not surprise to find myocarditis statistically tied back to that failure to hit a good target.

BTW, “the science” and “because . . . science” were previously “the scientific method” that was more thoughtful, thorough, and inclined toward more intense failure analysis - than what now passes too often as “the literature.”

To wit: There is now plenty of information to cause a thoughtful person interested in fixing problems, to spend more time on where the *idealism of ‘the shot,’* needs to be challenged.

BTW, almost every so-called face mask that is being used in public, functions mostly as a diffuser, along with varying levels of efficiency re droplet / material capture (filtering). Assuming at least 2 layers of fiber / fabric, such masks “work at filtering” by changing the direction of airflow, that causes some droplet / material to fail to make that change in direction . . . and be captured / trapped by some mask filament (sometimes coated with a “tacky” substance).

Such face masks offer only *some portion* of protection, and might assist on some occasions, with *some portion* of prevention. In other words, such public face masks might give a person an edge in the person’s favor - provided that such public face masks are properly worn and maintained.

But in general, such public face masks are mostly functioning as viral load diffusers. IMHO.


134 posted on 12/21/2021 12:22:02 PM PST by linMcHlp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

I’m totally ignorant of Q


135 posted on 12/21/2021 12:26:20 PM PST by wardaddy (Too many uninformed ..and scolds here )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

They are Nostradamus crossed with the Wizard of Oz seasoned with heavy doses of conspiracy theory. If you want to see where the nutbag theories ferment before hitting the main FR boards just wander over to their heartland.


136 posted on 12/21/2021 12:49:52 PM PST by Pelham (Q is short for quack )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay
Wow, nice little pointless diatribe.

Likewise.

You don’t need to follow the MSM to conclude Alex Jones is a Hack.

By his OWN admissions under oath he lied, knows he lied and did it anyway, or maybe you missed that entire liable trial he lost over Sandy Hook.


Huh? That's not even what your enemedia claims happened in the case. I don't know where you got that from. I'll need a citation on that before I read any more lecturing from you.

(CNN Business)Sandy Hook families suing InfoWars founder Alex Jones have won a case against him after a judge ruled against Jones who has failed to comply with the discovery process.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/15/media/alex-jones-sandy-hook-defamation-legal-victory/index.html

BTW, what is a "liable" trial?

The fact Alex Jones still has a career at all after what he did surrounding Sand Hook shows exactly how poor our public schools are at teaching critical thought and independent analysis.

Sorry, I don't see any "critical thought" or "fact based and thoughtful information" in the rest of your diatribe.

You haven't even stated what you think "he did surrounding Sand Hook" other than one vague accusation that I don't see any media confirmation for.

You might want to practice what you preach if you want to be taken seriously.
137 posted on 12/21/2021 1:01:32 PM PST by Subcutaneous Fishstick Blues
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

1. Trump should focus on money issues, like the economy, inflation, supply chains, and trade. His instincts on those issues are very good and he engages supporters on those issues very well.

2. O’Reilly’s advice is horrible from every perspective. It is bad for Trump’s future in politics, it is bad for Trump’s future in business, and it is just plain wrong.


138 posted on 12/21/2021 5:03:19 PM PST by Arcadian Empire (The Baric-Daszak-Fauci spike protein, by itself, is deadly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

I’m sure Trump is a big boy, and OReilly just took it on himself to say “ there there.” Then make it sound like a real thing. Same old phoney Bill.


139 posted on 12/21/2021 6:36:40 PM PST by hinckley buzzard ( Resist the narrative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

It is becoming more palpable daily.


140 posted on 12/21/2021 6:44:03 PM PST by going hot (Happiness is a Momma Deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-147 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson