Under the circumstances, she still had every right to use her glock
What I found surprising, was that in 27 years of mostly patrol duty, she never had a reason to draw her gun on a suspect before and in 18 years, never once fired her drawn taser at a suspect
But I can’t get over the fact, that despite the similarities of the grip and especially being on opposite side of her belt, the difference between the 2 weapons should have been obvious
“But I can’t get over the fact, that despite the similarities of the grip and especially being on opposite side of her belt, the difference between the 2 weapons should have been obvious”
The taser also has a safety.
The split second action situations and multiple movements and actions of a very explosive nature are not taught to be automatic in training, only the basic movements that need each reaction to be done. all confrontations are unique to time and place.