I gave you a link that walks you through dozens of reasons why it will not happen because the tech does not yet exist.
“Getting ready” and “considering” is what you are going to hear a lot of.....
It is like a kindergartner “getting ready” and “considering” going to college.
“Please provide a list of why this can’t be done.”
Here is one article that includes a partial list to get you started—it is just the tip of the iceberg:
https://www.aulis.com/moonbase2017.htm
Apollo deniers, in my experience, are not students of physics or mathematics; and, as such, do not have the metal tools to correctly judge these issues. APs do not understand the technologies of that period including photography, video imaging, and radio communications. Their judgements are based upon technology of the last twenty years or so. They also do not understand the political climate of the times, or the history of rocketry, medical science, and electronics. Apollo deniers will not make the effort to read "source" material, actual technical content of spacecraft hardware and mission planning. They also have a strong tendency to WANT the US to have failed those missions, and are by nature very cynical. All of this makes them immune to facts and reason.
I have in the past spent a great deal of time and energy trying to explain why the so-called Apollo denier experts are wrong, only to find the audience to be quite immune to facts. Yet, I'll try one on you just to verify predetermined results:
Deniers say that men cannot survive transit through the Van-Allen belts. The Van-Allen belts are torroids, big doughnuts with a hole in the middle. Apollo launched at a 71deg azimuth from the equator so that it could exit earth proximity by going up through the hole. When it turned toward the moon it went through the weak outer fringes of the Van-Allen belts, and was in them for only 10 minutes. The Van-Allen belts consist of electrons, protons, and other charged particles that are swirled around the earth by the magnetic field. The astronauts were shielded by the wall of the spacecraft, which were layers of stainless steel, aluminum, and ceramic. Secondary gamma emissions due to particle collisions was low intensity, and was recorded by dosimeters on each astronaut. Once developed, gamma exposure was equal to one chest X-ray. Radiation affects are dependent upon exposure time. They weren't in harm's way for very long. Vacuum aside, naked people wouldn't survive that trip. The spacecraft was shielded in accordance with measurements taken by satellite probes that flew long before the Apollo missions.
The Apollo missions did not happen suddenly or without precedence. Everything used in the moon missions had been refined using knowledge gained from near earth satellites and lunar satellites, crash probes, and soft landing probes. All mission elements were developed and refined during the development of WWII aircraft, the V2 rocket, ICBM missiles, Mercury and Gemini missions, as well as ground simulations.
First, the Saturn V did lift off several times. There are movies of it, and there are thousands upon thousands of eye-witnesses.
The tooling for making the F-1 was discarded along with the updated drawings. It was very expensive to make the tooling, let alone the design of the engine itself. NASA does not want to resurrect it on the grounds that newer designs are easier to tool and make; and, they would provide higher thrusts. The only way to recreate an F-1 engine is to scan it with X-ray 3-D imaging devices to see how the later versions were made.
You do know that NASA did not actually develop ANY of the Mercury/Gemini/Apollo hardware or any detailed designs, don't you? Every scrap of it was developed by contract companies. The F-1 engine was developed by Rocketdyne. Once NASA no longer needed it, they were free to dispose of all production artifacts. A few clever souls siphoned off historical artifacts.
Your referenced article is so very wrong. It would take a lot of effort to tear it down. Since I already know that such an effort is wasted on people like you, I will go no further.