Take the photos. Opps! Film messed up.
Do a lousy job and charge them triple - in advance. No more homo troubles.
The title is funny. lol
Out of focus, pictures of feet, guests with their mouths open, more pictures of the venue. They can make you take pictures, they can’t make you take good pictures.
I would think any photographer can find an excuse to not take a gig without specifying why.
What’s his weapon of choice? 🤪
Stop shooting weddings.
is it really that hard to take a bunch of off center, blurry, out of focus pictures with the top of their heads cut off???
after warning them they prolly would like somebody else’s work better...
If you want to shoot a wedding, go to Chicago.
Obama judge.
Have sign at store that all money from gay events goes to destroy the abortion movement..Nothing says you can’t spend your money any way you want...Gays loooove planned parenthood
Time to go on offense, folks. Government is clearly coopted by leftists.
This doesn’t happen in free countries. Can we stop pretending now that the US represents freedom to the rest of the world?
Is it possible that neither the judge or the photographer knows the photographer's 14th Amendment (14A) protections?
Excerpted from 14A:
"Section 1: All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States [emphasis added]; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
"Section 5: The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article."
The problem is this imo. Since since judges have relatively good job security, what's possibly going on is this. Democratic and RINO career lawmakers probably don't want to take responsibility for exercising their 14A power to make penal laws that discourage state actors from abridging rights that the states have amended the Constitution to expressly protect, 1st Amendment-protected freedom of religious expression in this example.
So instead of taking responsibility for what they were elected to do, lawmakers wrongly let judges and non-elected bureaucrats steal and exercise their legislative powers for them so that they they can keep their voting records clean and get reelected.
Also, consider that 14A is still alive and kicking in California!
UC Berkeley settles landmark free speech lawsuit, will pay $70,000 to conservative group (12.4.18)
In fact, those patriots who value their freedom of religious expression, note that Acts 22:23-29 shows us that Apostle Paul claimed his Roman citizenship to get out of a flogging.
Also, I wouldn't be surprised if taxpayers ultimately paid Berkeley's $70,000 settlement.
Insights welcome.
Geraci is an @$$.
Can it be appealed?