No, not at all. I accept that all or almost all of those events happened.
The CDC requires healthcare providers to report all adverse events following a vaccination to VAERS even if they know the event wasn't related to the vaccine.
The CDC investigates each reported death and to date has attributed only 9 to the shots.
What's misrepresentation is when people claim all of those events happened because of the vaccine.
That's exactly the case with this article. It claims the vaccine caused 132 cases of blindness.
That's not true, but no one would click on an article that told the truth.
People go blind. Sometimes following a vaccination and sometimes not. We don't have any evidence that there's a higher rate of blindness in the vaccinated.
That's it. That's the story. Not very compelling which is why the authors choose to lie. To generate clicks and make money.
And why would you trust the CDC?
Unless you’re a liberal of course.
We don’t have any evidence that there’s a higher rate of blindness in the vaccinate
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
False. We have evidence that blindness is associated with Covid vaccines at a far higher rate than any other vaccine, including the annual flu vaccine. There’s no reason for deaths, strokes, heart failure, blood clots, neurological damage and other injuries, like blindness, to cluster around Covid ‘vaccine’s at drastically greater levels than all other vaccines, often linking onset closely in time to injection (e.g., within 2 days). You keep deflecting from the obvious truth.