— “Simple. When someone says all these deaths are due to the vaccine when that’s not true, that’s misinformation.”
Equally simple. When one says almost none of these deaths is due to the gene therapy products when that’s not true, that’s misinformation.
I never stated “all.” Who did, for I am interesting in looking at those posts?
It's said in nearly every VAERS-related article posted here. If you're genuinely unaware I can find you many examples.
Although you weren't willing to state anything explicitly you came close yourself when you responded to my statement:
"— “I don't think any of these deaths were attributed to the vaccine.”
with:
Attributed? They attribute 1223 “case outcomes” as “fatal.”
Perhaps you can explain what else you meant in the context of my statement?
If it's not true, I agree.
The problem is I've seen no evidence that it's true, and I've seen evidence from the CDC's statements that it isn't true.
If there's no evidence it's true, an alternative statement supported by the evidence is the opposite of misinformation.