[Worldtraveler once upon a time]

— “The CDC is tasked with monitoring these adverse events. They review every reported death. So far they've attributed exactly 6 deaths to the J&J vaccine. That's it.”

As I read your several apologia, I conclude that 1) you accept the CDC’s data and related assertions as fully factual and trustworthy, 2) discard dissenting views, and 3) you are a booster for these vaccines.

“...you can't attribute all those deaths to the vaccine.”

In an ongoing phase three clinical trial with sometimes years left to run, and with only some small amount of Pfizer data having been released, your firm conviction and faith in the Fauci-Collins-Biden administration of these “emergency” and “experimental” drugs seems remarkable.

[semimojo]

1) you accept the CDC’s data and related assertions as fully factual and trustworthy

They may make mistakes but I think they're pretty competent and acting in good faith. Otherwise their data would have to be the product of a massive conspiracy and I don't believe in those.

2) discard dissenting views

No, I discard obvious misrepresentations, like saying or implying that every death occurring after a vaccination was the fault of the vaccine when the people supplying the data explicitly say you can't do that.

3) you are a booster for these vaccines

You haven't, and probably won't, see me advocating for the vaccines.

What I do do is advocate against obvious misinformation like this article because I think it can mislead people and could cause them to make harmful decisions.

I'm all for debate but it has to be based on honest data.