Citing numbers includes:
Using Worldometer’s latest “data” — with quotes around the word because the pretense at rigor in data taxonomy, collection, analysis and reporting is questionable — one finds:
( 5,261,659 deaths worldwide / 7,911,098,750 ) x 100 = circa 0.067 %
In plain words, the “pandemic” dead comprise less than one-tenth of one percent of the general population worldwide, in a world where about one percent of a population dies off each year as a rule of thumb.
As to the “two years of clinical data,” the mRNA vaccines have been given under the “emergency use authorization” since last December, in phase three clinical trials which will not be complete until the coming years. Even so, our FDA wants to reply to FOIA requests by taking decades to release “data.” And the “data” from the ongoing clinical trials are also not currently available.
Or perhaps you have the data? Which data do you trust? Please cite links to your data.
It is fascinating that so much reporting, positive and negative, is about telling what the future will bring. Other reporting, positive and negative, chooses some but not all data.
“In plain words, the “pandemic” dead comprise less than one-tenth of one percent of the general population worldwide, in a world where about one percent of a population dies off each year as a rule of thumb.”
You are using real-time figures that have the advantage of 8 billion vaccinated cutting the deaths without mentioning the benefit of the 8 billion vaccines. But for some hard reality, let’s go back to last year - to an unvaccinated world, with a less infectious and less lethal Alpha compared to this year’s Delta, and compare 2020 figures to the current 20% ICU mortality USA 2021:
“Peshawar, Pakistan, from April to August 2020. ICU mortality 75-94%
The overall mortality was 77%. Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) was administered to 61.8% of patients. Mortality was higher for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) (93.6% vs 66.7%, p<0.001) and for over 60 years (87.3% vs 72.3%, p=0.019). Mortality without co-morbidities was 75.2%.
AND, further down, same link:
“Studies have reported nearly 100% mortality amongst patients on invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) during the peak of the pandemic [10]. Mortality among patients on IMV was 88.6%, 97%, 43%, 31%, 88.8%, 22%, and 40%-60% in New York [7], China [11], UK [12], Spain [13], Australia [14], and India [15], respectively. With time, the mortality in ICUs declined to around 40% [4]. In the early days of the outbreak, there were no international guidelines for managing patients admitted to the ICU, and the rationing of resources based on local policies in overwhelmed ICUs might have added to divergent data”
There are 60 million ‘expected’ deaths any given year. Of that, 20% or 9 million are from starvation. Another 20% are from tropical diseases/TB/AIDS. Heart disease is the number one killer world-wide - 8 percent. Covid is about to eclipse heart disease as the number one killer, as it now accounts for 8.3% of ‘expected’ deaths. That’s more than those that are ‘expected’ to die from COPD, diabetes, lung cancer and Alzeheimers combined. But the pandemic profiteer siren song of “circa 0.067 %” sure sounds cozy, yeah?
https://www.theworldcounts.com/populations/world/deaths
“As to the “two years of clinical data,” the mRNA vaccines have been given under the “emergency use authorization” since last December, in phase three clinical trials which will not be complete until the coming years. “.
The phase 3 trials concluded Nov 2020. ‘not completed’ is pandemic profiteer misinformation based on an initial projected date instead of the actual date.
Nov 18, 2020:
https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/pfizer-and-biontech-conclude-phase-3-study-covid-19-vaccine
The claim that COVID-19 vaccines have skipped animal trials is also untrue .
“Oxford University confirmed the vaccine it created with AstraZeneca has undergone animal trials in the UK, US and Australia (here). Pfizer and BioNTech released information in Sept. 2020 about the effects of their mRNA vaccine in mice and non-human primates (here).
Moderna has released similar information (here, here), as has Johnson & Johnson (here).
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-covid-vaccines-idUSL1N2M70MW
the claim that vaccines need time to develop and be studied was true for 20th century first=generation vaccines that needed to be grown in eggs and other medium, introducing the possibility of allergies and cross-reactivity. This was labor and time intensive, and meant low batch rates - an inability to respond to a pandemic while limiting vaccines to those who weren’t allergic to eggs (or mice). Additionally, first generation science didn’t have the computing and communication power of the 21st century, much less the ability to access research on the internet with results in seconds. It took 20 years after the invention of a computer mouse for the appearance of Wiki and by that time the mouse was obsolete.
mRNA vaccines are a second=generation, 21st century product building on 30 years of research begun by Katalin Kariko, now known as the ‘mother of mRNA vaccines’. The first human proof of concept trial with a mRNA (rabies) vaccine was back in 2017. (Curevac AG, 2017). In the first year of the pandemic, cargo-ship loads of money were thrown at the finest medical research universities around the world who were -already- developing mRna candidates, enabling faster coordination and information sharing, as well as safer development and production of an effective vaccine completely in a laboratory, without the use of eggs, meaning quicker time to extensive animal trials, which were conducted prior to and concurrent with, human trials.