Sorry for getting unscientific when I meant to be ironic. It irritates me that a liberal point is always about follow the science. A massive winter cold spell shuts down multiple states as far south as Texas and we’re not allowed to say global cooling because “science” declares that it merely a weather event and not climate change. Then a spate of tornadoes hits the heart of the country and it’s not a weather event but global warming. And on. I agree that we should see accuracy, but who’s to say that 30 years from now we’ll find that science was wrong again.
> ...who’s to say that 30 years from now we’ll find that science was wrong again.
That’s not science, that’s politics. And this is radiocarbon dating, not the global warming BS.