There was not a single constructive thing I saw in that article. It is all socialist clap-trap.
"...The most ironic thing about rising inequality is how completely unnecessary and self-defeating it is. If we do something about it, if we adjust our policies in the way that, say, Franklin D. Roosevelt did during the Great Depression—so that we help the 99 percent and preempt the revolutionaries and crazies, the ones with the pitchforks—that will be the best thing possible for us rich folks, too. It’s not just that we’ll escape with our lives; it’s that we’ll most certainly get even richer..."
That is one example. It is jackasses like this guy who decides he has enough money and wants to get involved in politics that is more of a problem.
Good God.
I should say-I was in error saying there wasn’t a single constructive thing there. There was: Reduce the size of government.
But that isn’t what he is advocating. That is just blather.
He advocates more government oversight, intrusion, and involvement.
But yeah. His blather about reducing government is fine in itself. He just doesn’t mean it.
I don’t agree with his FDR assertion. Whatever help FDR gave to people, it unfortunately was done with policies that actually prolonged the depression.
I simply posted it because I found it interesting, but I don’t agree with everything that he says.
Hopefully, this author is living out his word and paying his workers at least $15/hr.