ABC News said the suitcase scandal was “debunked.” It wasn’t. And 9 of 10 people who view the video and hears the entire story KNOWS this was suspicious activist - to be kind.Put Ruby on the witness stand.
To: Libloather
Beware the buffalo what votes after midnight.
2 posted on
12/07/2021 2:21:28 AM PST by
ComputerGuy
(Heavily-medicated for your protection)
To: Libloather
This was just one of the discrepancies in Fulton County, Georgia that was never investigated. The media called it “debunked” stating that the ballots were from earlier in the day and were just stored under the table. The Secretary of State’s office never explained why Freeman was running stacks of ballots through the scanner multiple times and as far as I’ve heard, the media never actually addressed that issue. They basically said, “don’t believe what you see on that video” and that was that.
3 posted on
12/07/2021 2:25:09 AM PST by
CFW
To: Libloather
fbi no longer a law enforcement agency
4 posted on
12/07/2021 3:09:12 AM PST by
joshua c
(Dump the LEFT. Cable tv, Big tech, national name brands)
To: Libloather
Leftists often say that a belief was “debunked,” when it has been challenged but not disproven. Using that word makes it appear that the belief is false even if true.
5 posted on
12/07/2021 3:10:30 AM PST by
djpg
To: Libloather
6 posted on
12/07/2021 3:11:42 AM PST by
TheCipher
(I am a proud member of the LGBT (Let's Go Brandon Trolls ) community)
To: Libloather
All the evidence they need to convict this pair of election fraud is sitting in the evidence room at the FBI, just to the left of Hunter Biden’s laptop.
9 posted on
12/07/2021 1:14:34 PM PST by
nicollo
To: Libloather
Protect Democracy, through its Law for Truth project, represents Ms. Freeman and Ms. Moss, in partnership with the law firms DuBose Miller LLC, Dowd Bennett LLP, and Kastorf Law, LLC and the Yale Law School’s Media Freedom and Information Access Clinic.
So they have FIVE different groups helping represent/defend these two. How can they afford all these lawyers? If it's pro bono, what is so special about this case that the other groups jumped in after the first lawyer was already pro bono?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson