She got it from your mom.
Posted on 12/06/2021 11:33:11 AM PST by ransomnote
Abstract
Doctors today are driven by what the NIH says, not science. The NIH ignores everything that isn't big pharma.
Example: The Pfizer 6-month trial showed no all-cause mortality benefit; in fact, if anything, it showed that the vaccine killed more people than it saved. Sure, one COVID life was saved per 22,000 fully vaxed, but the all-cause mortality strongly favored the placebo (21 died in vaccine group vs. 17 in placebo). Doctors rush to recommend it. Nobody is skeptical.
Fluvoxamine on the other hand actually demonstrated a 12 times reduction in all-cause mortality in the Phase 3 trial.
SNIP
Welcome to 2021 where science is dead and we just follow orders from the NIH.
Why isn’t there an EUA for fluvoxamine? The reason is simple. We tried. And after 6 weeks of waiting, we were told that to get an EUA for a repurposed drug, you have to partner with a drug company in the EUA application. Because no drug company will partner with us, even if we pay all the filing costs, there won’t be an EUA. Ever.
SNIP
When the fluvoxamine Phase 3 study published in Lancet showed the drug worked better than any other drug (including the new antiviral pills from Merck and Pfizer), the NIH simply ignored the study. They didn’t even mention it.
SNIP
Basically, the system is set up so that only proprietary drugs that can kill you are approved.
So I wasted a lot of time and millions of dollars on proving that fluvoxamine works against COVID. I was right it does work. But Fauci is only going to allow a big Pharma solution to be adopted. Doctors do not follow the science.
SNIP
See my fluvoxamine article for more info about how you can use it to save your life if you get COVID. Don’t expect your doctor to tell you about it.
There shouldn’t be a need for an EUA for this as I understand it: MDs should be able to prescribe it off-label.
Moreover, of course, there shouldn’t be a need for an EUA anything, since such common off-label prescriptions (and OTC supplements as prophylactics) should be enough to handle Covid.
Because CoupFlu has NEVER been about public health.
Because the self assumeing lord and master Dr Fraudski ... I mean Fauci only lets Covid-19 treatments that guarantees further control over the population be condoned.
It started to keep Trump out.
Deep state public health effort after the intelligence and justice deep staters failed.
It’s spun totally out of control.
Won’t matter unless its considered a covered countermeasure.
Liability protection provided by the PREP Act only accrues to coveted countermeasures.
Handy, isn’t that.
How do you get some? Seeing a shrink?
On the contrary, the situation spiraled into almost complete control (of everybody’s life on the entire planet, almost). If a drug worked, then the basis for an EUA for the vaccine falls away, and hence the justification for vaccine mandates. That’s what they really want, and, therefore, that’s why other drugs are being suppressed. They’re not stupid, they’re seizing power, authority, and control over people’s lives - especially of the dissenter’s lives who don’t want to take the experimental jab: fired, can’t shop, eat, or travel, etc.
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Do you know why there isn't an EUA for fluvoxamine? The drug works. Amazingly well. Better than anything else against COVID when given early. So why isn't there an EUA?, 38special wrote: |
How do you get some? Seeing a shrink? |
It's possible to get prescriptions and treatment for Covid medications that Fauci doesn't want us to have.
You can order from India (no prescription required) or other over seas locations or you can get online medical appointments/prescriptions/pharmacies in the US which will provide them.
I don't know which doctors prescribe which Covid meds, but here's a few contacts. The first one has a page dedicated to medications - you can probably find more info there. So many people are using these services - it's best to purchase pro-actively before you get ill and not have to wait for an appointment once sick.
[get care, meds]
https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/treatments/
[Find out how to obtain prescription medication for COVID-19 with our AFLDS-trained physicians in three easy steps]
Dr Stella Telehealth Services – Welcome to Dr. Stella Immanuel MD (drstellamd.com) online appointments
Here's an Indian distributor located in Canada - this is their page for the drug (no prescription needed):
Buy Luvox Online - Happy Family Store (happyfamilymedstore.com)
This one has other Covid meds (Ivermectin/HCQ/AZ) but not fluvoxamine.
One guess:
‘Mengele’?
First, an EUA is not needed for an approved drug.
Second, the NIH is agnostic about fluvoxamine use re Covid:
“Recommendation
There is insufficient evidence for the COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel to recommend either for or against the use of fluvoxamine for the treatment of COVID-19. Results from adequately powered, well-designed, and well-conducted clinical trials are needed to provide more specific, evidence-based guidance on the role of fluvoxamine for the treatment of COVID-19.”
Link: https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/therapies/immunomodulators/fluvoxamine/
Any doctor is free to prescribe it for Covid. I have read some doctors are using it for Covid. Probably some don’t.
Me, personally, I’ll go with monoclonal antibody therapy if I get Covid again. But that’s just me. I don’t like the idea of messing with my brain chemistry — I’m just very cautious that way, perhaps overly so.
I know Steve Kirsch is a strong advocate for this drug to treat/prevent Covid, and it's even better than Ivermectin, but I don't want to mess around with psychotropic medications - unless absolutely necessary (I.e., I get very depressed by our oppressive government).
bkmk
The FDA does not want people successfully treated because successful treatments reduce the impetus for vaccinations.
She got it from your mom.
Push care is the service I used to get ivermectin. You can choose from a list of doctors. Make a virtual appointment and discuss with the physician what your needs are. My doctor prescribed the ivermectin as a preventative measure and then he added the Fluvoxamine if I tested positive for covid. Because we were both in Texas, he sent the prescription to the local Walgreens. And Bob’s your Uncle. Next day I picked up my prescription using coupons from Goodrx,
“Fluvoxamine on the other hand actually demonstrated a 12 times reduction in all-cause mortality in the Phase 3 trial. “
Actually the Lancet article
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/langlo/article/PIIS2214-109X(21)00448-4/fulltext
shows about 32 percent reduction in chance of death, not “12 times reduction”. This is because of the way randomized trials are conducted. You have to look at the “intention to treat” analysis. What happened the the Fluvoxamine trial was that many patients in the fluvoxamine arm of the trial died before they had finished the course of treatment. Among those who finished the entire course of treatment, there was a 12 times reduction in death. But 16 patients in the fluovoxamine arm of the trial died before they finished the treatment. Folks, please get into the weeds when reading these articles. Look at the actual trials, not the summary from “Steve Kirsch” as provided by “ransomnote”. Here’s a link to an article explaining the “intention to treat” concept in randomized trials. I just learned about this by reading this article.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5654877/
That being said, fluvoxamine does seem to help, and might make you feel more relaxed as a fringe benefit.
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Do you know why there isn't an EUA for fluvoxamine? The drug works. Amazingly well. Better than anything else against COVID when given early. So why isn't there an EUA?, brookwood wrote: |
“Fluvoxamine on the other hand actually demonstrated a 12 times reduction in all-cause mortality in the Phase 3 trial. “ Actually the Lancet article shows about 32 percent reduction in chance of death, not “12 times reduction”. This is because of the way randomized trials are conducted. You have to look at the “intention to treat” analysis. What happened the the Fluvoxamine trial was that many patients in the fluvoxamine arm of the trial died before they had finished the course of treatment. Among those who finished the entire course of treatment, there was a 12 times reduction in death. But 16 patients in the fluovoxamine arm of the trial died before they finished the treatment. Folks, please get into the weeds when reading these articles. Look at the actual trials, not the summary from “Steve Kirsch” as provided by “ransomnote”. Here’s a link to an article explaining the “intention to treat” concept in randomized trials. I just learned about this by reading this article. |
"There were 17 deaths in the fluvoxamine group and 25 deaths in the placebo group in the primary intention-to-treat analysis (odds ratio [OR] 0·68, 95% CI: 0·36–1·27)."
I have a cool line but I’m not sure if I should use it.
I’ve dwindled down to 1 or 2 anti-vax threads a week and don’t wanna upset the Apple cart……
Whatcha think?
Well, since you asked so politely, I think you should....
#PreambleToFullSurrender
#BagsterUnderstands
The FDA is corrupt. They have been for fifty years. Look up the Adactizide controversy from fifty plus years ago. I cannot think of a federal regulatory agency that is not corrupt and in the habit of ignoring truth to serve money interests. They have too much unchecked power because politicians are bought and sold like salted hams.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.