SeekAndFind wrote: “Well, if they don’t work, the free market will quickly show that they don’t.”
The fact that they don’t work has been fully demonstrated.
I do not believe that hundreds of thousands of health care workers in the US or millions world wide would be sitting on the information if they did work.
RE: The fact that they don’t work has been fully demonstrated.
NO IT HASN’T. If they don’t work, their patient base would quickly dry up, especially with the government threatening to shut them down. But they keep coming. Most of them through word of mouth from previous patients. It’s not for you to determine what works for someone when they themselves have experienced the benefits.
RE: I do not believe that hundreds of thousands of health care workers in the US or millions world wide would be
sitting on this information
Well, it’s because the information is being suppressed by the powers that be. But many knowledgeable researchers who bothered to look at the data for themselves know the benefits of early treatment with Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine.
Doctors like Harvey Risch of Yale University and many others aren’t your run of the mill snake oil sales man. They bothered to look at the studies and the results. They looked at the alternative — stay home, quarantine yourself and call the hospital if your condition gets worse — and concluded that using these therapeutics work.
ALL THESE DONE WITHOUT THREATS, ALL THESE DONE BY SIMPLY PROVIDING INFORMED CONSENT.
And here you are getting all worked up over a $90 to $100 medical consultation and $6 million in earnings for scores of doctors with thousands of patients and ignoring the power of government and our tax dollars being used to support the tens of billions revenues ( and counting with the need for boosters ) of the mRNA vaccine makers.
I looked at these two sides and ask myself... who has the moral high ground? Sorry, unless the factor of threat and coercion is taken out, I can’t side with Pfizer.