Posted on 12/03/2021 12:05:27 PM PST by ransomnote
You always pretend the numbers you are posting represent the total when it’s just a sliver of actual cases. Well, you’re concealing the truth, not pretending.
Pfizer said they weren’t aware of how much of the actual cases were reported as it was voluntary. It’s always something with those people. It was obviously dangerous and the Deep State agencies went ahead with it anyway. None of your whitewashing is going to erase that.
cuz1961 wrote: “created by the U.S. v Brandt court Did you miss that line ?”
Did you sleep through Civics class? Laws are not created by courts.
Civics were not taught in any of the schools I went to.
I am aware that it’s the sole perview of Congress to legislate laws.
I guess by your logic,
The u.s. was not in any way involved with or participated in the Nuremberg trials
So,, may I call you Allen or not ?
How’s metaverse these days ?.
DuncanWaring wrote: “Should it be the law?”
Evidently, Congress doesn’t think so. Otherwise they would have written it into Code.
I didn’t ask whether Congress thought it should be law.
I asked whether YOU thought it should be law.
Or are you going to be like Barky 0bama who responded to a question about his opinion that his own opinion was above his pay grade?
There is no such thing as the Nuremburg Law. There is a Nuremburg Code, but it has not been incorporated into law either by act of Congress or by Treaty.
**********************************************************************************
Some parts of the Nuremberg Code have been incorporated into Federal Code. And there have been court cases which uphold some of those.
For example:
45 CFR Sec. 46.116
10 U.S.C. 1107
21 U.S.C. 360bbb-3
Canterbury v Spence - It was recognized that consent required the informed exercise of choice. The disclosure made by the doctor should have provided the patient with an opportunity to assess the available options and the risks of such options.
Cobbs v Grant - held that a physician is bound to disclose all known material risks peculiar to the proposed procedure.
Wilkinson v Vesey - held that a physician is bound to disclose all known material risks peculiar to the proposed procedure.
Reference to the Nuremberg Code is also referenced as Nuremberg Laws. They are referenced both ways by The Hague for convicting Nazis.
The rule of opposites—when the mass media says the vaccines will “keep us safe” the truth is they will f*&^ you over...
Big Pharma’s lawyers can use that (”no law”) in their defense—before their clients are executed by firing squads for crimes against humanity.
cgbg wrote: “Big Pharma’s lawyers can use that (”no law”) in their defense—before their clients are executed by firing squads for crimes against humanity.”
You are truly delusional if you believe anyone is going to be executed by firing squad for their part in the vaccinations.
greeneyes wrote: “In what part of the US Code is the Nuremburg Code referenced?
Some parts of the Nuremberg Code have been incorporated into Federal Code. And there have been court cases which uphold some of those.
DuncanWaring wrote: “I didn’t ask whether Congress thought it should be law. I asked whether YOU thought it should be law.”
That isn’t the question. The discussion is whether the code has been incorporated into US law.
cuz1961 wrote: “Civics were not taught in any of the schools I went to. I am aware that it’s the sole perview of Congress to legislate laws.”
Then show me where the Nuremburg Code was explicitly incorporated into US law.
cuz1961 wrote: “The u.s. was not in any way involved with or participated in the Nuremberg trials”
Involvement in the Nuremburg trials does not make the Nuremburg Code a part of US law
cuz1961 wrote: “So,, may I call you Allen or not ? How’s metaverse these days ?.”
Do these two sentences make sense in your world?
Like a typical dishonest drone you lie by omission.
Here is what I wrote with the line
You
Left
Out
***I guess by your logic,**
The u.s. was not in any way involved with or participated in the Nuremberg trials .
Weasels weasel.
I want to call you Allen cuz you remind me of
Allen duke
Of Facebook metaverse “ fact” check fame.
cuz1961 wrote: “You Left Out ***I guess by your logic,**”
Completely irrelevant to whether the Nuremburg Code is a part of the US Code.
cuz1961 wrote: “I want to call you Allen cuz you remind me of Allen duke Of Facebook metaverse “ fact” check fame.”
IOW, you don’t like it when your embarrassed when others point out your misleading allegations that do not match reality. Got it. Perhaps that wouldn’t happen so often if you relied less on anti-vaxxer websites.
Lies of omission are all ways irrelevant to your ilk.
So, can I call you Allen ?
/-)
cuz1961 wrote: “Lies of omission are all ways irrelevant to your ilk.”
If you think it is so important, then please explain why...
cuz1961 wrote: “Lies of omission are all ways irrelevant to your ilk.”
If you think it is so important, then please explain why...
/\
Well allen, cuz lies are bad.
/-)
.
If someone in Congress were to introduce a bill to incorporate the Nuremberg Code into US law, would you support the passage of that bill?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.