“You have no idea what the margin of fraud is; none of us do.”
From my posted numbers I suspect at 25% in the battleground states. But, I would concede 20%. There is no way a brain-addled basement-dwelling candidate could exceed Obama by 30-35% in the fewer minority communities he won.
You may very well be correct; I'm not disputing your numbers here at all.
But I think we make a mistake when we argue percentages like this; the dispute over the election should be the fact that it was managed in such a way as to make transparency impossible. (Otherwise, it falls back to, "He said, she said", and the left is quite comfortable with this, as they control the institutions where these arguments are played out.)