It may all be innocuous, but the putting of people into camps still rubs me the wrong way. After all, my own country had its own sordid episode of putting Americans of Japanese ethnicity into camps on the West Coast during WWII, which, in hindsight, was unnecessary by most accounts.
Not apologizing like an Obama or Biden, just telling it like it was.
In Australia, the constitutional amendment from 1967 that specifically allowed the Federal government to intervene to protect indigenous people is considered one of the most important positive steps in addressing historical racism and helping these people - by both indigenous and non-indigenous Australians.
So interventions like this are more often than not seen as a good thing - provided they are done properly. It's not considered equivalent to internment (which Australia also did during the wars) - it's in a separate category of health intervention.
It allows indigenous people to continue to live on their ancestral lands even when it wouldn't normally be viable to do so, because when it's necessary for health reasons, they can be taken somewhere temporarily to receive the care they need. People choose to live in these communities with that understanding.