[semimojo]

But all they have are the real numbers of the two populations; we have no way of knowing how many "vaccinated" or "unvaccinated" never even made it to the hospital.

So then I assume you agree the author can't use this data to "prove(s) the Fully Vaccinated are on the road to disaster and suggests the Covid-19 Vaccines are causing Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome"

Right?

[Captain Walker]

I think the data presented would suggest this.

But to argue against the point, one has to present contrary data or evidence that demonstrates that the point is incorrect.

I'm not saying that such data doesn't exist, only that it hasn't been presented.

You're taking the position that there are far more numbers of "vaxed" than "unvaxed", and that the author's data is misleading because of this.

Your point might be 100% correct, except that the author is the one presenting evidence, and so far, you haven't.

[bagster]

So then I assume you agree the author can't use this data to "prove(s) the Fully Vaccinated are on the road to disaster and suggests the Covid-19 Vaccines are causing Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome". Right?

The term you're looking for is PRECIPICE of disaster.

To put it bluntly, the “fully vaccinated” are on the precipice of disaster.

I mean, let's be blunt. Right?

#FormerlyKnownAsMojo