[semimojo]

As well as proving without a shadow of a doubt that the vaccines are clearly incapable of preventing infection or transmission of the virus, the above chart clearly demonstrates that the vaccinated are much more likely to be infected or transmit the virus.

It shows no such thing and is a perfect example of a theexpose.uk lie.

The absolute number of new cases may be higher in the vaccinated population but that's because there are more vaccinated people than unvaccinated.

These data don't indicate a higher risk for the vaccinated. The article is just more exploitation of the credulous by the dishonest.

[bagster]

These data don't indicate a higher risk for the vaccinated. The article is just more exploitation of the credulous by the dishonest.

Apparently, being 'on the precipice of disaster' triggers you.

#FomerlyKnownAsMojo

[Captain Walker]

The absolute number of new cases may be higher in the vaccinated population but that's because there are more vaccinated people than unvaccinated.

Then why should anyone get "vaccinated"?

(I don't want to put you on the spot, but it's the question that gets brought up here repeatedly and is met with nothing more than a blank stare in response. The Vaxzis talk themselves into a corner and then simply disappear when they realize that they've just made the anti-vax argument.)