You’re trying hard to be offensive, but remain in the merely annoying while amusing camp.
You seem to be offended that I did not automatically assume you were (a) local and (b) better informed than I am. On the internet, that is a dangerously stupid assumption. You were combative and attempted to be condescending throughout - ignoring that I did not say it wasn’t what you thought, but rather that I preferred to assimilate more information (including yours) for myself.
I find your combative attitude pathetic, even though I do appreciate the little bit of local information that you offer as evidence. The fact that my various news sources have tended to confirm the points you make. For the new information I have seen from you, I thank you. I will note that you only profferred the new information AFTER angrily demanding I not have a differing opinion.
In the intervening day since we first engaged, I did see information from Andy Ngo about the suspect’s social media, which is a large part of the reason my opinion is migrating. Other reputable sources (not anonymous internet posters) have also confirmed other aspects of the suspect’s past and his openly avowed positions. Some have asserted that he is part of the Nation of Islam 5%, although I am still waiting to see independent confirmation on that.
If you want to convince me, I am open to discussing the facts civilly. If you are only interested in pretending that being an angry, abusive internet poster increases your clout and/or persuasiveness, I’ll just stop responding.
It’s your choice.
Thought you would consider being labelled as a GOPe apologist a badge of honor- later