As I said, I formed an opinion based on the facts as I understood them. If enough facts are established to warrant a change of opinion, I will change it.
He should have known the parade was happening if he was from the area. Did he? Equating should have and did assumes facts not in evidence.
Going 60mph through barricades could be either an intentional act, or could be a reaction to panic for being caught for a serious crime.
I reserve the right to wait and see. I appreciate the more civil tone of this post, BTW.
Fair enough....
Are we going to ask him if that was his motive? Not a direct question to you more of a rhetorical question—just odd how one would ever give any credence to the word of a living, breathing monster.