I don’t see any misinformation. And I don’t see anywhere he is asking for money.
But if you can prove that this is “misinformation” by all means post some independent research showing otherwise (those with a conflict of interest - Pfizer, CDC, etc don’t count).
I already posted the footnote that has the explicit warning from the researchers that you can't take the comparative mortality data for the 1-59 year old population at face value. It was in the dataset he claims to have checked himself.
Despite this very clear, reasonable explanation Berenson says:
"I don’t know how to explain this other than vaccine-caused mortality."
Do you think that's honest?
He may be the laziest journalist in history and not look at the footnotes in a document he's quoting, or he may be intentionally posting something he knows is wrong just to agitate the credulous, but either way it's misinformation.