There are no property rights here…there is only The Bill of Rights you sheep! You’re incorrect. In this specific instance, the Bill of Rights generally has nothing to do with the jerk in Costco throwing a temper tantrum. The Bill of Rights is a check on power of the government, not a check on the power of Costco.
If he didn’t like Costco’s policies (even if mandated by the State), he could either protest off their property or don’t go there to shop. Instead, he drew attention to himself in an uncomplimentary way, and affected Costco’s “pursuit of happiness”.
Pretty sad the number of FReepers that think so poorly of private property rights.
Instead, he drew attention to himself in an uncomplimentary way, and affected Costco’s “pursuit of happiness”. Boy, you're really stretching it, Ruth Bader-Ginsburg. I guess the Constitution means just what you want it to mean, hey?
No, dear. When business becomes a de facto arm of the government, that's called fascism. We don't tolerate fascism in this country and any Costco b*tch fit is not only justified, but required, not withstanding your sheeply desire to go along to get along and mollify the fascists.
You vaxtards' attempt to invoked private property rights is cowardly and irrelevant. But what can we expect from government leg humpers? The revolutionaries had a word for people like you, Furry.
Tories.
