[semimojo]

You really had to dig deep in the data to come up with that irrelevant footnote.

You mean the footnote the researchers included because they figured some grifter would try to misrepresent their data?

The one where they explicitly say you can't use this data to claim what Berenson is?

That one?

[bagster]

You mean the footnote the researchers included because they figured some grifter would try to misrepresent their data?

I wouldn't call you a grifter, Mojo. More like a derp state shill embed looking to steer opinion away from your derp state fake poison vax.

You're basically #TeamDerp on every issue. Nobody's buying what you're selling. You are revealed.

No. Not a grifter. Something much worse.

[Ceebass]

You mean the footnote blah blah blah?

The one where they explicitly blah blah?

That blah?.....

Hi leftist troll and previously banned mojo.

Why should I answer any of your loaded questions when you never answered my simple one?

The next time you get banned are you coming back as quasimojo?