| volunbeer wrote: |
Honest and respectful question. At this point, given the overwhelming data, why should we believe the VAERS data when it is put in the system and administered by the same people who deny the effectiveness of ivermectin, HCQ, and other therapeutic treatments? They might as well allow Merck and Pfizer to administer the VAERS system. |
The CDC is withholding, deleting and revising data in VAERS to falsely portray the 'vaccines' as safe. They created a forumula to calculate the number of deaths which would signal the 'vaccine' should be pulled from use. Mathmeticians got together to examine the formula and determined that it was quite literally mathmatically impossible to exceed the safety threshold using the CDC's algorithm.
Normally they name a panel of experts which will review the data in VAERS. This time, with Covid 'vaccines', they said nothing until after the review was over and refused to name any physicians on it, other than to say they were with the FDA. However, FDA physicians do not have the training/skill set to conduct a safety review, which would in reality have taken months to conduct because of all the data.
Two whistleblowers (and their lawsuits) allege they have seen 45 thousand post vaccine deaths (within three days) sitting in the CMS (medicare) database unreported to VAERS. The CMS database is only one of a dozen systems intended to automatically report to VAERs. How many systems have data unreported to VAERS?
The CDC should have honored it's mandate and made the database accessible, but it intionally left the buggy, hard-to-use interface exactly as it was to discourage reporting (e.g., it logs you out automatically without warning at the 20minute mark, and you have to start over from the beginning). With Covid, the CDC created V-Safe, a database to house Covid adverse events (why not centralize as intended?) which only the CDC is permitted to access (oh that's why!). ALl persons vaccinated are offered a free convenient phone app (why isn't there one for VAERS after 30 years?) to report adverse events - and keep it hidden from the public.
Many doctors don't even know VAERS exists, and if they do they are either threatened if they report to it or they are unwilling to spend 45 minutes of unpaid time filling out paper reports.
VAERS wildly under reports the harm done by the Covid 'vaccines', and all other vaccines, because that's the way the CDC responded to the Congressional mandate to make vaccine harm data available to the public.
But even though the CDC is working to hide most of the data, and we're only looking at a sliver, the sliver is catastrophic. The vaccines are far worse than VAERS reveals, and whistleblowers, and doctors, victims, funeral home directors, researchers etc.
Good explanation and thanks for writing it. I had not paid more than scant attention to the system admittedly because I have so little trust in the institutions to begin with.
This is criminal. Local jurisdictions need to start talking about empaneling grand juries to investigate this. One can make a compelling argument (albeit not a slam dunk) that the behavior of some in our government is bordering on negligent homicide.