Yes, because he was trying to focus on the segment of the population where mortality is generally low, and where any adverse effects of the vaccines might be more apparent and more relevant.But he doesn't have the data to explore that because the vaccinated group skews older.
His source for the data explicitly stated this and explained why the comparison he's making isn't valid, yet he publishes this anyway.
If I was a vax sceptic I'd be offended that Berenson has so little respect for me. He's willing to intentionally mislead me just to perpetuate his grift.
If he had included the older age groups, you probably would have made an issue of THAT.
Why would I make an issue of more complete data?
I have the raw data set.
I haven't done a big analysis but in the week of September 24th the all-cause death rate per 100,000 for fully vaccinated people over 80 was 10. For the unvaccinated over 80 it was 40.
Four times higher for the unvaccinated.
How about the 60-69 cohort?
Vaccinated - 1.1
Unvaccinated - 8.5
He's focusing on the one cohort where he can misrepresent the data since he thinks people won't read the footnotes while ignoring the data showing the all-cause death rate is overall massively higher in the unvaccinated.
If I was a vax sceptic I'd be offended that Berenson has so little respect for me. He's not alone, banned liberal troll formerly known as Mojo.
He's focusing on the one cohort where he can misrepresent the data since he thinks people won't read the footnotes while ignoring the data showing the all-cause death rate is overall massively higher in the unvaccinated.
But back in the real world, ALL CAUSE deaths are up in the vaccinated.
Ergo ipso facto, the vax is killing people.
I don't like that fact, but you REALLY don't like it. Cause you're a derp state shill for the vax, no matter the consequences.
No. You just go ahead and be offended, nobody has respect for you.
