Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time meta analysis of 66 studies
https://ivmmeta.com/
Meta analysis using the most serious outcome reported shows 67% [53‑76%] and 85% [75‑91%] improvement for early treatment and prophylaxis, with similar results after exclusion based sensitivity analysis (which excludes all of the GMK/BBC team studies), with primary outcomes, and after restriction to peer-reviewed studies or Randomized Controlled Trials.
Lots of good Ivermectin links.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4011908/posts?page=11#11
I remember that link. I might even have posted it at some point back when I was excited about IVM. But none of those studies involve testing against Delta and an in-depth analysis of those studies showed fraud. Even Dr. Kory’s own “study”, since pulled by the publisher, is alleged to have been fabricated, as the hospital says testing never happened.
with an avg 14-day resolve of mild symptoms/infectivity for youngsters, 67% ‘improvement’ ‘for early treatment’ doesn’t sound very good when you think about it. By 14 days doing nothing at all most people will be at 100% ‘improvement’. So it’s still not as good as monoclonals.
Kory got caught in a trap of his own making and now has to admit ivermectin is not effective against Delta (but maybe, he says, if you take twice as much, it might be!).
You’re better off trusting your life to monoclonals.