Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

The press is focuses on James Bond, but for my money, the big remake prize in the MGM catalog is Stargate.


1 posted on 11/09/2021 12:49:06 PM PST by Brookhaven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Brookhaven

2 posted on 11/09/2021 12:54:06 PM PST by rfp1234 (Comitia asinorum et rhinocerum delenda sunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brookhaven

I’m actually hoping they don’t screw up Wheel of Time.


3 posted on 11/09/2021 12:55:34 PM PST by BushCountry (Fun Fact: Goods made in America do not get stuck on cargo ships.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brookhaven

“Amazon has struggled to distinguish itself in the streaming market”

Want to distinguish yourself in the streaming market? Offer _everything_.

I’m not interested in [streaming_service] Exclusive.
That’s making stuff for the central purpose of being the only one supplying it, which detracts from the central purpose of making stuff CUSTOMERS WANT.
I actually go out of my way to ignore “Amazon/Hulu/AppleTV+/whatever Exclusive” movies.

I’m interested in getting _everything_ from ONE SOURCE.
I know I can walk into a public library and find or order darned near any book ever published (exotica aside).
I just had a prolonged heated discussion with my wife yesterday, trying to explain to her why I can’t “just get Movie X” without forking over stupid money to get services I otherwise don’t want - when I’d have no problem with dropping ~$6 to rent what she wants on-demand, _if_I_could_. (Not signing up for $7-70/month just so she can wait for a channel to get around to playing Movie X when they darned well feel like it, and then I pay for several months of it before realizing she hasn’t watched anything on that service past the first week, and I waste time figuring out how to cancel it.)

We’re in the 21st Century.
The vision of Netflix/Amazon/AppleTV+/etc is to provide customers EVERYTHING, ON DEMAND for a modest flat- and/or rental-rate. But no, they’re squabbling over rights control (ok, understandable, it’s big bucks) and trying to produce “Exclusive!” movies that weren’t asked for.

Amid all this squabbling, I noticed The Name Of The Rose has disappeared outright. Major movie, highly rated, big stars, ... gone.


6 posted on 11/09/2021 1:59:57 PM PST by ctdonath2 (Statistics don't matter when they happen to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brookhaven

So what is America’s future, less than 25 giant companies owning and running everything????


8 posted on 11/09/2021 2:36:21 PM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brookhaven

Maybe Prime will improve its available for viewing catalog. It’s pathetic if subscribers can’t drill down into at least historical cinematic works of international impact. All the greats. TCM with an advanced scholarly selection.


9 posted on 11/09/2021 3:12:54 PM PST by Clutch Martin (The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brookhaven

Maybe Prime will improve its available for viewing catalog. It’s pathetic if subscribers can’t drill down into at least historical cinematic works of international impact. All the greats. TCM with an advanced scholarly selection.


10 posted on 11/09/2021 3:13:42 PM PST by Clutch Martin (The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brookhaven

Yes more Stargate SG-1 please.


11 posted on 11/09/2021 4:29:50 PM PST by Weaponier (FREE TEXAS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson