Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Wonder Warthog

for the cold fusion ping list


2 posted on 11/08/2021 9:36:31 PM PST by Kevmo (I’m immune from Covid since I don’t watch TV.🤗)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


  

Dr. Melvin H. Miles
Visiting Professor
Dixie State University
St. George, Utah 84770, U.S.A.
email: mhmiles1937@gmail.com
ICCF – 23 in Xiamen, China (Virtual)
June 9-11, 2021
Presentation Outline
I. Show Experimental Results For Early Excess Power Using NRL Pd-B Cathode.
A. NHE Laboratory (Japan) Using F-P Dewar Calorimetry (1997).
B. Ridgecrest, California (U.S.A.) Using Copper Heat Conduction Calorimeter (2016).
C. Naval Research Laboratory Results Using a Seebeck Calorimeter (1995).
(Importance Not Realized Until 2018)
II. Discuss Possible Calorimetric Error Sources.
A. Thermoneutral Potential (EH).
B. Cell Heat Capacity (CpM).
C. Rate of Cell Temperature Change (dT/dt).
III: Discuss Possible Boron Effects For Cold Fusion.
A. Direct B+D Reactions Have Been Proposed.
B. Essential Element For Fusion Process.
C. Provides Nuclear Reaction Zones.
(Vacancies, Cracks, Grain Boundaries, Electrical Double Layers).
D. Boron May Act as “Trigger” For Cold Fusion Reactions.
EARLY EXCESS POWER EVENTS FOR Pd-B CATHODES
1. NHE Laboratory (Japan) Using F-P Dewar Calorimeter
(December 5, 1997)
❖ First Noted by Martin Fleischmann
-- Mean Excess Power of 57 mW at 55 minutes
-- Mean Excess Power of 38 mW for First 24 hours
“It is obviously very important to establish whether this early establishment
of positive feedback is a property of Pd-B alloys ---”.
(M. Fleischmann, NRL Report (2001), p. 25)
2. Ridgecrest, California Laboratory Using a Heat Conduction Calorimeter
(July 3, 2016)
❖ Measured Excess Power was 118 mW at 8 minutes
3. Naval Research Laboratory (U.S.A.) Using a Hart Seebeck Calorimeter
(January, 1995)
❖Continuous Excess Power During and Following Loading
(5 to 15 mW)
(Not Recognized Until 2018)
Pd – 0.5 B At NHE (Japan)
(Fleischmann’s Analysis For First Two Days)
Early Excess Power
(PX
)
(13.9 h) (27.8 h) (41.7 h) (56.8 h)
0.050 W
0.040 W
0.010 W
0
M.H. Miles, M. Fleischmann and M.A. Imam, “Calorimetric Analysis of a Heavy Water Electrolysis
Experiment Using a Pd-B Alloy Cathode.” NRL/MR/6320-01-8526, March 26, 2001, P. 81. Each point is a 55
minute average.
(Other Experimental Points Show the “Lower Bound” heat transfer coefficient).
Early Excess Power
(PX
)
Fleischmann Analysis
Mean Excess Power per Day for the NHE (Japan) Pd-0.5 B Experiment
-100
0
100
200
300
400
500
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
P
x (mW)
Time(Day)
(See NRL Report, pp. 79, 88-91)
(kR = 0.85065x10-9 W/K4
, CpM = 450 J/K)
20 40 60
Days Days Days
(400 mW)
(0 mW)
Miles Analysis
Study of NRL Pd-B Rod In Japan (NHE)
(0.50 wt. % B, 0.471 x 2.01 cm, V=0.35 cm3
,
December 1997 – February 1998)
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0 1000000 2000000 3000000 4000000 5000000 6000000 Excess Power (W)
Time (seconds)
F / P Cells - Pd - 0.5B
December 5, 1997 - February 2, 1998
Excess Power
PX-2
(kR = 0.81120x10-9 W/K4
, CpM = 490 J/K)
24 Days 58 Days
* The kR Value Used Was Too Small
Early Excess Power For Ridgecrest California Experiment
(Pd-0.5 B Cathode Using My Copper Calorimeter)
March 18, 2017
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
120.0
140.0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Excess Power (mW)
Time (minutes)
(kC = 0.1205 W/K , CpM = 450 J/K)
Figure 3. Early excess power for a Pd-0.5 B rod (0.47 x 2.01 cm). The dashed line shows the
maximum excess power expected for 100% deuterium loading at the cell current of
I = 0.150 A. PL = (1.5267 – 1.3448)(0.150 A) = 0.0273 W.
Early Excess Power For Pd – 0.75 B At NRL
Miles/Dominguez / January 1995
New Seebeck Calorimeter (Hart)
Time/Hours Time/Hours
Cell C
Time/Hours
40 60 80 100 120 140 1 
Possible Calorimetric Error Sources
A. The Thermoneutral Potential (EH)
❑ Assume 100% Deuterium Loading
ΔH˚ = 77.85 kJ/mol Pd
EH
˚ = - ΔH˚ / 0.6 F = - 1.3448 V
❑ Only Explains Excess Power Due To Loading
For I = 0.1500A , PX
(Loading) = 0.0273 W (27.3 mW)
(Note: Previous Calculation Error for ΔH˚ Led To Incorrect Conclusion)
✓ EH is NOT An Error Source
✓ Decreases In EH Explained By Deuterium Loading.
Pd + 0.3 D2O PdD0.6 + 0.15 O2
PX = (1.5267 – 1.3448) I = 0.1819 I
Possible Calorimetric Error Sources
B. The Cell Heat Capacity (CpM)
• Where PX
’ = PX + PG + PW and f(T) = T – Tb
(Heat Conduction)
f(T) = T4 – Tb
4 (Heat Radiation)
Note: Initially CpMdT/dt is Large
F-P Dewar Cell CHECK CpM = 450 J/K
90 mL D2O = 419 J/K
20 cm3 Pyrex Glass = 30 J/K
Pd + Pt Metals = 2 J/K
EXPERIMENTAL CHECK TOTAL = 451 J/K
CpM Is NOT An Error Source
No Discontinuities Across Cell Heating Pulses (Large CpMdT/dt)
(See NRL Report, pp. 72,73)
PX
’ = CpMdT/dt + k f(T) - (E – EH
) I
Possible Calorimetric Error Sources
C. Rate of Cell Temperature Change (dT/dt)
Accurate Methods Exist For Determining dT/dt
➢Graphical (T vs. time Graph)
➢Polynomial Fitting (T = a + bt + ct2 +dt3 + ----)
dT/dt = b + 2 ct + 3 dt2 + ---
➢Numerical Integration (Avoids dT/dt use)
(Simpson or Trapezoidal Rule)
CpMdT/dt ≈> CpM (T2 – T1
)
(W) (J)
Any Error Due to dT/dt Can Be Minimized or Avoided
Lower Bound Cell Constant (k’)
(Sensitive To Early Excess Power)
oCalculation of k’ Assumes Zero Excess Power
Rearranged ≈>
▪ k’ Often Negative For Real PX
and Small ΔT
(Early in Experiment)
Pd-0.5 B Data Point At t = 8.0 Minutes
ΔT = 0.55 K, E = 4.440 V, I = 0.150 A, dT/dt = 1.083x10-3 K/s (0.065 K/m)
PX = (0.1205 + 0.09155)(0.55K) = 0.1166 W
(Omitting PG
and P W)
(See M. Fleischmann and S. Pons, Physics Letters A, 176, 118-129, 1993)
k’ = k - PX
/ΔT
PX = (k – k’) ΔT
k’ = -0.09155 W/K
k = 0.1205 W/K
(117 mW)
Possible Boron Effects For LENR
1. Boron As An Essential Element For LENR.
✓ Boron In Pyrex May Explain Weeks/Months of Electrolysis Before LENR Appears.
✓ Explains Why Repeated Experiments With The Same Cathode Often Produce Larger Effects.
2. Boron May Participate in Fusion Reactions.
✓ D + B-10 → 3 He-4 + 17.6 MeV
✓ Active Electrodes Show B-10 Depletion
(See T.O. Passell, ICCF-6 and ICCF-11 Proceedings)
3. Boron May Aid Creation of Nuclear Reaction Zones.
✓ Vacancies, Cracks, Grain Boundaries, Double Layers.
4. Boron May Act as “Trigger” For LENR
5. Boron Greatly Slows Deuterium Deloading Rate.
6. Boron Is An Unusual Element.
✓ B Atom Has Three Unpaired Electrons.
(Unpaired electrons affect NMR Spectra, see DNP).
✓ Calcium Boride Often Used in Palladium Preparation.
(Oxygen Getter)
Mathematical Modeling Of Early Cell Behavior
(Theoretical Increase of T - Tb With Time For PX
’ = 0)
➢CpMdΔT/dt = (E - EH)I – k(T - Tb
) + P’X Where ΔT = T – Tb
✓Assume P’X = PX + PG + PW = 0 (Tb = T0
)
dΔT/dt = α - γΔT
Where α = (E - EH)I / CpM (K/s), γ = k/CpM (s-1
)
➢Integration Yields
ΔT = T – T0 = (α/γ)[1 – exp (-γt)]
For Small – γt then exp ( - γt) ≈ 1 – γt Thus ΔT ≈ αt
❑ Cell Temperature Initially Increases Linearly With Time
Initial Experimental And Calculated ΔT Values
t (minutes) T – To
(K) T – To (K) E (V) P’X (mW)
(Experimental) Calculated)
0.0 0 0 -- --
2.0 0.120 0.111 4.345 87
4.0 0.270 0.222 4.389 98
6.0 0.420 0.331 4.419 112
8.0 0.550 0.437 4.440 118
10.0 0.675 0.540 4.451 93
12.0 0.800 0.633 4.425 84
14.0 0.910 0.730 4.440 76
16.0 1.010 0.824 4.446 59
18.0 1.110 0.916 4.458 60
20.0 1.190 1.005 4.465 50
Table 2. Initial Cell Temperatures: Experimental and Calculated.
For First 10 Minutes: ΔH = CpM [(T – T0
) - (T’ – T0
)]
= 450 J/K [0.135 K] = 61 J
Mean Excess Power:  = 61 J/(10)(60)s = 0.102 W
PX [87, 98, 112, 118, 93 mW]  Excess Power Measurements Are Correct.
(Early Excess Power Mainly Used To Heat Cell)
SUMMARY For Pd-B CATHODES
1. Very Early Excess Power Measured In Different Experiments.
▪ Excess Power Detected Within Minutes Of Electrolysis.
▪ Three Different Laboratories Using Three Different Calorimeters.
2. No Error Source Explains This Early Excess Power.
▪ EH
, CpM, dT/dt Are Not Error Sources.
3. Possible Boron Effects For Cold Fusion (LENR).
▪ Direct B + D Reactions.
▪ Boron Is An Essential Element For LENR.
▪ Boron May Aid In Creating Nuclear Reaction Zones.
▪ Boron May Serve as “Trigger” For Start of LENR.
Note: Boron Loads Normally But De-Loads Very Slowly.
(Boron Atoms In Grain Boundaries May Block Deuterium Escape).
Acknowledgements
1. Masao Sumi
✓ Helped At NHE In Setting Up F-P Type Experiments.
✓ Sent Me Complete Computer Data For My NHE Experiments.
(I was denied this data when leaving NHE).
2. Dr. Martin Fleischmann
✓ Provided Detailed Analysis For My NHE Pd-0.5 B Experiment.
✓ First To Show Early Excess Power For NRL Pd-0.5 B Cathode.
3. Dr. M.A. Imam
✓ Prepared Pd-B Cathodes At Naval Research Laboratory (NRL).
(U.S. Patent 6764561B1, July 20, 2004)
4. Dr. Fred Saalfeld, Head of NRL In 2001
✓ Allowed Publication of Fleischmann’s Analysis As a NRL Report.
(Despite Considerable Cold Fusion Controversy Within U.S. Navy).
5. M Fleischmann and S. Pons For Accurate Calorimetric Equations.
6. Financial Support From Anonymous Fund At The Denver Foundation Through The Dixie
Foundation at Dixie State University.  

3 posted on 11/08/2021 9:38:41 PM PST by Kevmo (I’m immune from Covid since I don’t watch TV.🤗)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: dangerdoc; citizen; Liberty1970; Red Badger; Wonder Warthog; PA Engineer; glock rocks; free_life; ..

The Cold Fusion/LENR Ping List

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/coldfusion/index?tab=articles

Keywords: ColdFusion; LENR; lanr; CMNS
chat—science

http://lenr-canr.org/

Vortex-L
http://tinyurl.com/pxtqx3y

Best book to get started on this subject:
EXCESS HEAT
Why Cold Fusion Research Prevailed by Charles Beaudette

https://www.abebooks.com/9780967854809/Excess-Heat-Why-Cold-Fusion-0967854806/plp


Updated No Internal Trolling Rules for FR per Jim Robinson

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3928396/posts

If someone says stop, then stop. Do not enter onto a thread on a topic you don’t like just to disrupt, rattle cages, poke sticks, insult the regulars, or engage in trolling activities, etc. ~Jim Robinson


This topic has a following, people who wish to learn and discuss the materials presented.

Please refrain from posting anything that doesn’t legitimately address the issue.

Something is going on in this segment of science. There are a considerable number of research groups studying the matter. -Sidebar Moderator


The issue isn’t whether we allow skepticism, it is whether we allow hyperskeptics and skeptopaths to ruin the scientific dialog. Civil discussion of the involved science is desired.



6 posted on 11/09/2021 5:05:00 AM PST by Wonder Warthog (Not Responding to Seagull Snark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo

Bkmk


8 posted on 11/09/2021 6:24:53 AM PST by sauropod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson