Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DesertRhino

From another article:

He asked attorney for Hannah Gutierrez-Reed, Jason Bowles, “Why were there live rounds on the set in the first place?”

Bowles replied, “That’s the biggest question in the whole case.”

He explained, “There’s no purpose for a live round on this set, zero…There was no reason for there to be live rounds. She didn’t have live rounds. She didn’t purchase any of this ammunition. This ammunition was purchased by other people, production.”

https://ijr.com/attorney-armorer-alec-baldwin-movie-sabotage-set/

She didn’t purchase any of it.


53 posted on 11/06/2021 11:38:13 PM PDT by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: conservative98

OHHHH, she was asked. Well that clears it up. LOL

I don’t know how to break this to you, but people in her position making statements to the press a couple of days after the event are not trustworthy.

See also “CYA”.


54 posted on 11/06/2021 11:57:41 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs are called man's best friend. Moslems hate dogs. Add it up....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson