semimojo wrote: |
I am so grateful to TheExpose, and Karl Denninger's work on this information. Ah, the same stupid Expose/Denninger analysis. Their analysis relies on the lots all being the same size. We (and they) know they aren't all the same size. Their analysis is meaningless without this information and they know it but it generates clicks for them from the credulous. You continue to post this rubbish from people who are knowingly deceiving you for money and show you no respect. Why? |
*
You don't understand the importance of the data that persists despite disparity in lot size. That doesn't mean others are stupid.
Without knowing much more about the lots, including their sizes, the data that persists is entirely unreliable.
That doesn't mean others are stupid.
They are if they rely on this data.