Yes, it is.
I'm 62, and in a somewhat higher risk category. I don't mind getting vaccinated to protect me from COVID (however, after seeing the number of "breakthrough" cases at work, I'm not sure how protected I really am.) If there are unknown long term side effects that appear in 20 years, I really don't care since I'll probably be dead by then anyway.
But I don't want my young nieces and nephews who are perfectly healthy, one of which already had COVID and he bounced back like it was a common cold) jabbed with this DNA-altering experimental concoction. What if there is an unforeseen side effect that Leukemia develops after 20 years? We are going to have a worldwide medical epidemic far, far worse than COVID in the future.
“I don’t mind getting vaccinated to protect me from COVID (however, after seeing the number of “breakthrough” cases at work, I’m not sure how protected I really am.)”
That’s fine, but no one should feel protected after about 6 months (if that). Best to go on Ivermectin at that point if you want to still be protected.
ADE seems to be setting in already. Immune systems already compromised. Would you be okay with having your 62yo sister forced to take the jab?
To me it seems all wrong.
That's because it basically is, except for severely immunocompromised or otherwise frail (and/or obese) people.
EVERYTHING about "COVID" is a LIE.