He’s been banging on about aspiration of injections for a few months now, and when he works up a head of steam, he can be very convincing.
I’m old enough to remember when this was standard procedure. It was a big reason that kids didn’t like shots: it hurts!
But it’s hard to dispute his logic on the topic: it imposes no additional health risk, and could potentially eliminate the 1/10,000 times that the needle tip is inadvertently placed into a blood vessel. Seems like a good cost/benefit ratio, tbh.
But it’s hard to dispute his logic on the topic: it imposes no additional health risk, and could potentially eliminate the 1/10,000 times that the needle tip is inadvertently placed into a blood vessel. Seems like a good cost/benefit ratio, tbh.
—
Campbell had a great segment about a week ago where he interviewed a pro mountain biker named Kyle Warner who suffered very bad effects (myocarditis) following the second Covid shot.
Kyle mentions a tasting a metallic taste within seconds of getting the 2nd shot. He now potentially faces long term health issues and the potential loss of the job he loves because of the vaccine.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7inaTiDKaU
“I’m old enough to remember when this was standard procedure.”
Me too. When did it change???
The guy who vaxxed me aspirated first.
He also uses the Swiss cheese analogy to support aspiration, especially in young men.
Yes, there may be other factors that make myocarditis and pericarditis more common with young men with MRNa injections. But if you take away the inadvertent venous injection, the other causes may not line up to cause the problem. Like if you had four pieces of Swiss cheese and laid them, one on top of the other, on the table. If you line up all the holes, you see the table. If one of the holes is not there, you don’t see the table. If intravenous injection is removed from the equation, whatever reason young men especially (but still infrequently) experience myocarditis may be interrupted.
Because it doesn’t cause harm to aspirate, then why not do it? If one person in the world is saved suffering from the practice, is there a good reason not to do it?