Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DUMBGRUNT

According to Williams, the Millennium Tower was originally designed as a much-lighter steel high-rise. When the design changed to 58-floors of heavy concrete, he believes the foundation became inadequate.

“They must’ve decided to either risk it or convince themselves that it would work for the much-heavier building. But clearly, they pushed it past its limits,” said Williams.

If this is true, it is an outrageous building change. No structural engineer to review? the city inspectional service didn’t notice a change like this? Criminal.

One needs a structural engineer to sign-off on removing a wall in a kitchen and sizing a support beam in a house. that a change of this significance was made to a skyscraper without a structural review is beyond belief.


14 posted on 10/29/2021 9:29:15 AM PDT by Flick Lives (The future is a quiet world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Flick Lives

—”skyscraper without a structural review is beyond belief.”

And I for one think it is a BS charge.

In the early design phase, before any geotechnical reports, simply a concept and always low budget. And nothing more.

A genius attorney spinning BS.


25 posted on 10/29/2021 9:45:17 AM PDT by DUMBGRUNT (("The enemy has overrun us. We are blowing up everything. Vive la France!"Dien Bien Phu last message)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson